NARRATIVE REVIEW AND CRITICIZE OF SURROGATE DECISION-MAKING IN LIBERAL MEDICAL ETHICS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOMENI NASER; ZAMANI MAHDI; DARVISHI TAFVIZI MANSOUR

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Medical Ethics Year:2016 | Volume:10 | Issue:36 Page(s): 15-24

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,246

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NARRATIVE REVIEW AND CRITICIZE OF SURROGATE DECISION-MAKING IN LIBERAL MEDICAL ETHICS

Author(s)

MOMENI NASER | ZAMANI MAHDI | DARVISHI TAFVIZI MANSOUR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LIBERALISMQ2

MEDICAL ETHICSQ3

AUTONOMYQ2

SURROGATEQ2

DECISION-MAKINGQ2

Abstract

The right of patients to make decisions about their medical care, based on informed consent rule and the principle of respect for AUTONOMY rooted from philosophy of LIBERALISM. Patients with capacity are responsible for DECISION-MAKING, but in those lacking capacity, a SURROGATE decision maker is needed. This process consisted of three parts: choosing SURROGATE decision maker, how to make decision and its criteria, if they founded on the intellectual foundations of LIBERALISM, will faced with the challenges, so, must be sought the its solution ways in other philosophical systems. This narrative research tries to analyze and criticize the process of surrogacy decision making based on theoretical essentials of LIBERALISM, meanwhile descript epistemic sources of LIBERALISM. In conclusion, although, MEDICAL ETHICS based on LIBERALISM principles has been designed in a structured manner and can resolve some problems of ethical decisions in medicine, could be however faced with serious challenges.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOMENI, NASER, ZAMANI, MAHDI, & DARVISHI TAFVIZI, MANSOUR. (2016). NARRATIVE REVIEW AND CRITICIZE OF SURROGATE DECISION-MAKING IN LIBERAL MEDICAL ETHICS. MEDICAL ETHICS, 10(36), 15-24. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/195776/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOMENI NASER, ZAMANI MAHDI, DARVISHI TAFVIZI MANSOUR. NARRATIVE REVIEW AND CRITICIZE OF SURROGATE DECISION-MAKING IN LIBERAL MEDICAL ETHICS. MEDICAL ETHICS[Internet]. 2016;10(36):15-24. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/195776/en

IEEE: Copy

NASER MOMENI, MAHDI ZAMANI, and MANSOUR DARVISHI TAFVIZI, “NARRATIVE REVIEW AND CRITICIZE OF SURROGATE DECISION-MAKING IN LIBERAL MEDICAL ETHICS,” MEDICAL ETHICS, vol. 10, no. 36, pp. 15–24, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/195776/en

Related Journal Papers