EVALUATIVE DOXASTIC PRACTICES: MORAL EPISTEMOLOGY OF ROBERT MERRIHEW ADAMS RECONSIDERED

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHAFOURIAN MEHDI; SADEGHI MASOUD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2017 | Volume:50 | Issue:1 Page(s): 103-118

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

558

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATIVE DOXASTIC PRACTICES: MORAL EPISTEMOLOGY OF ROBERT MERRIHEW ADAMS RECONSIDERED

Author(s)

GHAFOURIAN MEHDI | SADEGHI MASOUD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DOXASTIC PRACTICEQ1

EVALUATIVE DOXASTIC PRACTICEQ2

MORAL BELIEFQ1

MORAL FAITHQ1

Abstract

Robert Adams, Inspired by William Alston's theory of DOXASTIC PRACTICE, forms his moral epistemology and coins the term of “evaluative DOXASTIC PRACTICE”. The inputs of evaluative DOXASTIC PRACTICE are historical and cultural tradition, as well as feelings, emotions, inclinations and desires. These inputs accompanied with thinking about them bring about MORAL BELIEFs as outputs of evaluative DOXASTIC PRACTICEs. In Adams’ view, MORAL FAITH provides the confidence base of MORAL BELIEFs formed thorough evaluative DOXASTIC PRACTICEs. MORAL FAITH is necessary because the MORAL BELIEFs are not above any kind of reasonable doubt, Although there are not any reasons against them.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHAFOURIAN, MEHDI, & SADEGHI, MASOUD. (2017). EVALUATIVE DOXASTIC PRACTICES: MORAL EPISTEMOLOGY OF ROBERT MERRIHEW ADAMS RECONSIDERED. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 50(1 ), 103-118. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198304/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHAFOURIAN MEHDI, SADEGHI MASOUD. EVALUATIVE DOXASTIC PRACTICES: MORAL EPISTEMOLOGY OF ROBERT MERRIHEW ADAMS RECONSIDERED. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2017;50(1 ):103-118. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198304/en

IEEE: Copy

MEHDI GHAFOURIAN, and MASOUD SADEGHI, “EVALUATIVE DOXASTIC PRACTICES: MORAL EPISTEMOLOGY OF ROBERT MERRIHEW ADAMS RECONSIDERED,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 50, no. 1 , pp. 103–118, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198304/en

Related Journal Papers