A STUDY COMPARING THE BUREAUCRACY TYPES OF FACULTIES OF MANAGEMENT IN THE UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN, AND ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY, BASED ON MINTZBERG MODEL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DEHGHAN NABIALAH; MORADI AYDISHE SHABAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES IN DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION Year:2011 | Volume:20 | Issue:63 Page(s): 153-182

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

911

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A STUDY COMPARING THE BUREAUCRACY TYPES OF FACULTIES OF MANAGEMENT IN THE UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN, AND ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY, BASED ON MINTZBERG MODEL

Author(s)

DEHGHAN NABIALAH | MORADI AYDISHE SHABAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTUREQ2

BUREAUCRACYQ2

MINTZBERG MODELQ2

Abstract

This research was performed to identify and compare the BUREAUCRACY types of the faculties of management in the University of Tehran, and Islamic Azad university (Central Tehran branch), based on MINTZBERG MODEL. The research was descriptive-survey both in objective and nature. Statistical population incorporated management faculty members of the aforementioned universities. Data were collected using appropriate documentation and questionnaires, and subsequently were analyzed by suitable statistical methods. Results indicated that the structures of the faculties were a combination of machine and bureaucratic structures with a slight inclination towards the former, also that, the amounts of structural and contextual factors in these faculties were the same indicating no significant difference between them. Moreover, investigation of the structural and contextual factors revealed a mismatch between the structural design ruling these faculties and the professional structures of the universities.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DEHGHAN, NABIALAH, & MORADI AYDISHE, SHABAN. (2011). A STUDY COMPARING THE BUREAUCRACY TYPES OF FACULTIES OF MANAGEMENT IN THE UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN, AND ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY, BASED ON MINTZBERG MODEL. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES IN DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION, 20(63), 153-182. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/202915/en

Vancouver: Copy

DEHGHAN NABIALAH, MORADI AYDISHE SHABAN. A STUDY COMPARING THE BUREAUCRACY TYPES OF FACULTIES OF MANAGEMENT IN THE UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN, AND ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY, BASED ON MINTZBERG MODEL. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES IN DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION[Internet]. 2011;20(63):153-182. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/202915/en

IEEE: Copy

NABIALAH DEHGHAN, and SHABAN MORADI AYDISHE, “A STUDY COMPARING THE BUREAUCRACY TYPES OF FACULTIES OF MANAGEMENT IN THE UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN, AND ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY, BASED ON MINTZBERG MODEL,” JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES IN DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION, vol. 20, no. 63, pp. 153–182, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/202915/en

Related Journal Papers