POPPERIAN SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY AND VALUE - JUDGMENT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAJADI SEYYED HEDAYAT

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: FALSAFE-YE ELM (PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE) Year:2011 | Volume:1 | Issue:1 Page(s): 37-59

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,200

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

POPPERIAN SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY AND VALUE - JUDGMENT

Author(s)

SAJADI SEYYED HEDAYAT | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

POPPERQ2

SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGYQ2

VALUE-JUDGMENTQ2

METHODOLOGICAL RULESQ2

BASIC STATEMENTSQ1

Abstract

Although POPPER admits that in arriving at some of his proposals, he has been guided by value judgments and predilections, according to his own statements, it does not mean that he has made the same mistake of which he has accused the positivists through discussing the role of VALUE-JUDGMENTs in POPPER’s philosophy of science, It is argued here that value judgment’s influence on POPPER’s SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY is further than his own admission. It seems to me, there are two important points in POPPERian methodology, which are open to influx of values: the conventionalizing process of METHODOLOGICAL RULES; and the decision making process of BASIC STATEMENTS. Upon the analyses of these two processes, following conclusions are drawn out that ‘scientists qua scientist make VALUE-JUDGMENT’, and ‘POPPER as a philosopher of science, makes VALUE-JUDGMENT’.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SAJADI, SEYYED HEDAYAT. (2011). POPPERIAN SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY AND VALUE - JUDGMENT. FALSAFE-YE ELM (PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE), 1(1), 37-59. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/205936/en

Vancouver: Copy

SAJADI SEYYED HEDAYAT. POPPERIAN SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY AND VALUE - JUDGMENT. FALSAFE-YE ELM (PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE)[Internet]. 2011;1(1):37-59. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/205936/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED HEDAYAT SAJADI, “POPPERIAN SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGY AND VALUE - JUDGMENT,” FALSAFE-YE ELM (PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–59, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/205936/en

Related Journal Papers