Information Journal Paper
APA:
CopyAMINI, D., AFROOZ, GH.A., AHADI, H., HOMAN, H., & SHARIFI DARAMADI, P.. (2011). COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INDUCTIVE THINKING STRATEGIES INSTRUCTION METHOD WITH THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH INSTRUCTION ON SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENTS OF MENTALLY RETARDED FIFTH GRADERS OF HAMEDAN. PSYCHOLOGY OF EXCEPTIONAL INDIVIDUALS, 1(2), 1-18. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/208429/en
Vancouver:
CopyAMINI D., AFROOZ GH.A., AHADI H., HOMAN H., SHARIFI DARAMADI P.. COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INDUCTIVE THINKING STRATEGIES INSTRUCTION METHOD WITH THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH INSTRUCTION ON SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENTS OF MENTALLY RETARDED FIFTH GRADERS OF HAMEDAN. PSYCHOLOGY OF EXCEPTIONAL INDIVIDUALS[Internet]. 2011;1(2):1-18. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/208429/en
IEEE:
CopyD. AMINI, GH.A. AFROOZ, H. AHADI, H. HOMAN, and P. SHARIFI DARAMADI, “COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INDUCTIVE THINKING STRATEGIES INSTRUCTION METHOD WITH THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH INSTRUCTION ON SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENTS OF MENTALLY RETARDED FIFTH GRADERS OF HAMEDAN,” PSYCHOLOGY OF EXCEPTIONAL INDIVIDUALS, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/208429/en