مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

826
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF POETIC PLAGIARISM BASED ON AL-JURJ NIS THEORY OF NADHM AND RUSSIAN FORMALISM

Pages

  61-80

Abstract

  This study is an attempt to present a theoretical framework for evaluation of POETIC PLAGIARISM. The study essentially dressed on what basis plagiarism can be spotted and how appropriation can be evaluated. The study is an analytical-comparative one. The analytical section of the study proposed a method and framework for determining whether a poetic work could be marked with plagiarism, and the comparative section applied the proposed framework in practice. a brief review of the literature on POETIC PLAGIARISM in Arabic rhetorical tradition was presented. It was shown that Al-Jurj? ni has sporadically discussed POETIC PLAGIARISM besides elaborating his ‘ THEORY OF NADHM’ and has applied a systematic method for analyzing the relationship between poems which has not received attention thereafter. Then Al-Jurj? ni’ s method was compared with the method utilized by the Russian formalists in their analysis of the historical relationship between poems. The comparison showed that the formalist approach in the 20th century used an analytical method similar to Al-Jurj? ni’ s. A new theoretical framework was proposed based on the common principles of these approaches for determining whether a poem was plagiarized. It was accordingly argued that plagiarism can be determined neither based on similarity of contents nor similarity of the common aesthetics, but rather based on the common features that the poetic works have regarding application of new aesthetics. Having proven that one poetic work was appropriated by another based on the proposed method, the was assessed to see what role the common aesthetics played in composition of each of the poetic forms since it is the aesthetics which mirrors the relationship between the poems in creation of their forms. That being the case, it was shown that a comparison of the functions carried out by the common aesthetics in formation of each poem can indicate how the former poem led to plagiarism in the latter. At the end, a comparative analysis was carried out based on the proposed method to show the different kinds of plagiarism in poetry.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MORADI, MOHAMMAD HADI, KHOORSHA, SADEGH, & HAJMOMEN, HESAM. (2019). A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF POETIC PLAGIARISM BASED ON AL-JURJ NIS THEORY OF NADHM AND RUSSIAN FORMALISM. ARABIC LITERATURE (FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES), 10(2 ), 61-80. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/211636/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MORADI MOHAMMAD HADI, KHOORSHA SADEGH, HAJMOMEN HESAM. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF POETIC PLAGIARISM BASED ON AL-JURJ NIS THEORY OF NADHM AND RUSSIAN FORMALISM. ARABIC LITERATURE (FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES)[Internet]. 2019;10(2 ):61-80. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/211636/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMAD HADI MORADI, SADEGH KHOORSHA, and HESAM HAJMOMEN, “A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF POETIC PLAGIARISM BASED ON AL-JURJ NIS THEORY OF NADHM AND RUSSIAN FORMALISM,” ARABIC LITERATURE (FACULTY OF LETTERS AND HUMANITIES), vol. 10, no. 2 , pp. 61–80, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/211636/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button