مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

588
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY AND MEDIAL BRANCH BLOCKAGE IN CONTROLLING FACET-ORIGINATING LOW BACK PAIN

Pages

  39-46

Abstract

 Aim and Background: Using methods such as PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY (PRF) and nerve blocks are among the methods used in pain clinics to treat facet-originating LOW BACK PAIN. This study compares two methods of PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY and facet joint block (FJB) regarding pain recovery and improving disability of patients suffering from facet-originating LOW BACK PAIN. Methods and Materials: 50 patients with LOW BACK PAIN and positive response to diagnostic nerve block test with 0.5 ml of 2% lidocaine in L1-L3 and L3-L5 were included. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups of either PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY at a temperature below 40 degrees or FACET JOINT NERVE BLOCK. Demographic data including age, sex, pain intensity (based on VAS), motor ability (based on ODI) and patient satisfaction (0=none, 10=Excellent) before the treatment and at weeks 6 and 12 thereafter were recorded.Findings: Patients’ pain and ODI significantly improved in PRF group compared with FJB group at week 6 and 12 (p<0.05). Patients’ satisfaction in PRF group at week 6 and 12 was significantly more than the FJB group (p<0.05). Using analgesics in PRF group at week 6 and 12 was significantly lower than FJB group (p<0.05).Conclusions: PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY more favorably alleviates pain and improves ability in shortterm.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MORADKHANI, MAHMOODREZA, MOMENZADEH, SIROUS, NEMATOLLAHI, FATEMEH, HASSANZADEH KIABI, FARSHAD, & RAZAVI, SEYED SADJAD. (2012). COMPARISON OF PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY AND MEDIAL BRANCH BLOCKAGE IN CONTROLLING FACET-ORIGINATING LOW BACK PAIN. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN), 3(1), 39-46. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/216189/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MORADKHANI MAHMOODREZA, MOMENZADEH SIROUS, NEMATOLLAHI FATEMEH, HASSANZADEH KIABI FARSHAD, RAZAVI SEYED SADJAD. COMPARISON OF PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY AND MEDIAL BRANCH BLOCKAGE IN CONTROLLING FACET-ORIGINATING LOW BACK PAIN. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN)[Internet]. 2012;3(1):39-46. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/216189/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MAHMOODREZA MORADKHANI, SIROUS MOMENZADEH, FATEMEH NEMATOLLAHI, FARSHAD HASSANZADEH KIABI, and SEYED SADJAD RAZAVI, “COMPARISON OF PULSED RADIOFREQUENCY AND MEDIAL BRANCH BLOCKAGE IN CONTROLLING FACET-ORIGINATING LOW BACK PAIN,” JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/216189/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button