مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

678
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EFFECT OF BUPIVACAINE %0.5 VERSUS LIDOCAINE %2 INJECTION FOR PAIN CONTROL IN PATIENTS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL)

Pages

  74-81

Abstract

 Aim and Background: Controlling PAIN in the post-operative period is still one of the challenging issues for anaesthesiologists as it tremendously helps patients to return to their daily life as soon as possible. In this survey we have tried to compare the efficacy of %0.5 BUPIVACAINE and %2 LIDOCAINE with normal saline for controlling PAIN after PCNL.Methods and Materials: In a double blind clinical trial, 60 patients were enrolled being divided into 3 groups. %0.5 BUPIVACAINE in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg diluted in 20 cc normal saline was injected, into the insertion site and also the tract of the PCNL probe in group one. In our second group, %2 LIDOCAINE (4mg/kg) diluted in 20 cc normal saline, and in the third group, just 20cc NS were injected in the same manner and direction. VAS was measured at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 hours post-operatively in order to evaluate PAIN control. Findings: The mean VAS measured 0, 3, and 6 hours post-operatively in the BUPIVACAINE and LIDOCAINE groups was less than the normal saline group (P<0.05). The average time to injection of the first dose of pethedine was longer in the BUPIVACAINE and LIDOCAINE groups than the normal saline group (p<0.05).Conclusions: Injection of 0.5% BUPIVACAINE and %2 LIDOCAINE in the puncture site of PCNL is effective for PAIN control after PCNL surgery according to our results.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KHOSHRANG, HOSSEIN, AKHAVAN, SEYEDREZA, FALAHATKAR, SIAVASH, MOMENZADEH, SIROUS, HASSANZADEH KIABI, FARSHAD, & RAZAVI, SEYED SADJAD. (2013). THE EFFECT OF BUPIVACAINE %0.5 VERSUS LIDOCAINE %2 INJECTION FOR PAIN CONTROL IN PATIENTS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL). JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN), 3(2), 74-81. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/216262/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KHOSHRANG HOSSEIN, AKHAVAN SEYEDREZA, FALAHATKAR SIAVASH, MOMENZADEH SIROUS, HASSANZADEH KIABI FARSHAD, RAZAVI SEYED SADJAD. THE EFFECT OF BUPIVACAINE %0.5 VERSUS LIDOCAINE %2 INJECTION FOR PAIN CONTROL IN PATIENTS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL). JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN)[Internet]. 2013;3(2):74-81. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/216262/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HOSSEIN KHOSHRANG, SEYEDREZA AKHAVAN, SIAVASH FALAHATKAR, SIROUS MOMENZADEH, FARSHAD HASSANZADEH KIABI, and SEYED SADJAD RAZAVI, “THE EFFECT OF BUPIVACAINE %0.5 VERSUS LIDOCAINE %2 INJECTION FOR PAIN CONTROL IN PATIENTS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL),” JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 74–81, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/216262/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top