COMPARISON BETWEEN TRANSFORAMINAL EPIDURAL STROID INJECTION AND PULSE RADIOFREQUENCY IN PAIN CONTROL OF RADICULAR LOW BACK PAIN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

IMANI FARNAD; ENTEZARI SAEIDREZA; RAHIM ZADEH POOPAK; FEIZ HAMIDREZA; SAEIDIFARD MAHZAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain Year:2017 | Volume:7 | Issue:3 Page(s): 11-24

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,043

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN TRANSFORAMINAL EPIDURAL STROID INJECTION AND PULSE RADIOFREQUENCY IN PAIN CONTROL OF RADICULAR LOW BACK PAIN

Author(s)

Keywords

PULSE RADIOFREQUENCYQ1

TRANSFORAMINAL EPIDURAL INJECTIONQ3

LOW BACK PAINQ1

OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEXQ1

PAIN IMPROVEMENTQ1

Abstract

Aim and Background: PULSE RADIOFREQUENCY (PRF) is a pain treatment modality, and is used for various painful states in clinical practice. To compare TRANSFORAMINAL EPIDURAL INJECTION of steroid with PRF in the pain in patients with low back radicular pain.Materials and methods: In this single blind randomized clinical trial study, on 42 patients devided to PRF group and TF group. Pain Score were measured by use of VAS, ODI, analgesic requirement, lazec test before the treatment, 24 hours, 1 week, 1 mounth, 3 mounths after the treatment.Findings: The successful rate was 100% in PRF group and 23.5% in TF group, that showed significant difference between the groups (p=0.0001). Pain score was significantly decreased in different times in the PRF group (p=0.0001). There was no significant difference in change of ODI and analgesic requirement between the two groups at different times during the follow up (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in propofol administered between the DEX and remifentanil groups in intraoperative time (P>0.05).Conclusion: It seems that Pulsed RF treatment is a safe and simple procedure to control radicular pain in the lumbar regions.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

IMANI, FARNAD, ENTEZARI, SAEIDREZA, RAHIM ZADEH, POOPAK, FEIZ, HAMIDREZA, & SAEIDIFARD, MAHZAD. (2017). COMPARISON BETWEEN TRANSFORAMINAL EPIDURAL STROID INJECTION AND PULSE RADIOFREQUENCY IN PAIN CONTROL OF RADICULAR LOW BACK PAIN. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN), 7(3 ), 11-24. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/216369/en

Vancouver: Copy

IMANI FARNAD, ENTEZARI SAEIDREZA, RAHIM ZADEH POOPAK, FEIZ HAMIDREZA, SAEIDIFARD MAHZAD. COMPARISON BETWEEN TRANSFORAMINAL EPIDURAL STROID INJECTION AND PULSE RADIOFREQUENCY IN PAIN CONTROL OF RADICULAR LOW BACK PAIN. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN)[Internet]. 2017;7(3 ):11-24. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/216369/en

IEEE: Copy

FARNAD IMANI, SAEIDREZA ENTEZARI, POOPAK RAHIM ZADEH, HAMIDREZA FEIZ, and MAHZAD SAEIDIFARD, “COMPARISON BETWEEN TRANSFORAMINAL EPIDURAL STROID INJECTION AND PULSE RADIOFREQUENCY IN PAIN CONTROL OF RADICULAR LOW BACK PAIN,” JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN (PERSIAN), vol. 7, no. 3 , pp. 11–24, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/216369/en

Related Journal Papers