QURANIC CRITIQUE OF TWO COGNITIVE AND NON-COGNITIVE APPROACHES IN ETHICAL WEAKNESS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALIZADEH MEHDI

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Research Quarterly in Islamic Ethics Year:2016 | Volume:9 | Issue:31 Page(s): 7-30

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

664

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

QURANIC CRITIQUE OF TWO COGNITIVE AND NON-COGNITIVE APPROACHES IN ETHICAL WEAKNESS

Author(s)

ALIZADEH MEHDI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ETHICAL WEAKNESSQ2

CLEAVAGE OF VIEWPOINT FROM ACTIONQ2

ANTHROPOLOGYQ2

QURANIC ETHICSQ2

PLATONIC PSYCHOLOGY OF ETHICS. ARISTOTELIAN PSYCHOLOGY OF ETHICSQ2

Abstract

One of the ancient ethical problems in regard to psychology of ethics which is dealt by ethical philosophers has been analysis of “conscious ethical error”. Does human possibly commit ethical errors consciously and deliberately? If yes, what factor this documented event is upon? Two cognitive and non-cognitive approaches have been formed to answer this question. According to the first approach, the possibility of committing conscious ethical error is ruled out and it is believed that ethical error is always attributed to ignorance and lack of knowledge. Giving a positive answer to the possibility of occurrence of this phenomenon, the second approach searches for its roots within both cognitive and non-cognitive layers in human free will system and it considers that the root of occurrence of ethical error is related to incorrect knowledge. Historically, the first person who proposed the first approach was Plato (the one who fixed Socrates’ viewpoint) and the first person who proposed the second viewpoint was Aristotle. This paper is dealt with explaining these two approaches toward the Holy Quran and they are judged based on Quranic teachings. The author has found no verses supporting the first approach while 7 groups of the verses were found which confirm the second approach in that CLEAVAGE OF VIEWPOINT FROM ACTION and ETHICAL WEAKNESS is possible and realizable and has introduced various non-cognitive roots for it.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ALIZADEH, MEHDI. (2016). QURANIC CRITIQUE OF TWO COGNITIVE AND NON-COGNITIVE APPROACHES IN ETHICAL WEAKNESS. PAZHUHESH NAME-E AKHLAGH, 9(31), 7-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/217424/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALIZADEH MEHDI. QURANIC CRITIQUE OF TWO COGNITIVE AND NON-COGNITIVE APPROACHES IN ETHICAL WEAKNESS. PAZHUHESH NAME-E AKHLAGH[Internet]. 2016;9(31):7-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/217424/en

IEEE: Copy

MEHDI ALIZADEH, “QURANIC CRITIQUE OF TWO COGNITIVE AND NON-COGNITIVE APPROACHES IN ETHICAL WEAKNESS,” PAZHUHESH NAME-E AKHLAGH, vol. 9, no. 31, pp. 7–30, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/217424/en

Related Journal Papers