EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TEMPORARY CEMENTS ON THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED CROWNS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HAFEZ GHORAN A.; KORDYDARIAN R.; MORSHEDI K.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental School Year:2009 | Volume:27 | Issue:2 (80) Page(s): 53-59

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

962

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TEMPORARY CEMENTS ON THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED CROWNS

Author(s)

HAFEZ GHORAN A. | KORDYDARIAN R. | MORSHEDI K. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DENTAL IMPLANTQ2

LUTING AGENTSQ3

TENSILE STRENGTHQ2

RETENTIONQ3

Abstract

Background and Aim: Using provisional LUTING AGENTS in cemented type implant supported prosthesis have advantage of retrievability; however adequate RETENTION is demanded. This study compared the RETENTION of restoration cemented with different types of provisional LUTING AGENTS.Materials & Methods: In this experimental study, thirty titanium implant abutments (Biohorizons) with 8mm height, were placed in implant analogs and torqued to 30 N/cm. Implant analogous were mounted in auto polymerizing acrylic resin blocks using surveyor. After casting crowns for each abutment, provisional LUTING AGENTS TempBond, Dycal and TempBond NE were used to cement the restorations upon their respective abutments. All specimens were stored in 100% humidity for 48 hours at 37°C prior to testing. Each crown was pulled from the abutment with a 500 kg load in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 cm/min, and TENSILE STRENGTH was recorded in Newton. Data were analyzed using ANOVA.Results: TENSILE STRENGTH was significantly higher for Dycal (26.01±3.53) than for TempBond NE (22.00±3.06) and TempBond (15.60±2.67).Conclusion: When retrievability of implant supported prosthesis is desired, Temp Bond is suggested to be a better choice and Dycal when additional RETENTION for prosthesis is required.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HAFEZ GHORAN, A., KORDYDARIAN, R., & MORSHEDI, K.. (2009). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TEMPORARY CEMENTS ON THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED CROWNS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 27(2 (80)), 53-59. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/21778/en

Vancouver: Copy

HAFEZ GHORAN A., KORDYDARIAN R., MORSHEDI K.. EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TEMPORARY CEMENTS ON THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED CROWNS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2009;27(2 (80)):53-59. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/21778/en

IEEE: Copy

A. HAFEZ GHORAN, R. KORDYDARIAN, and K. MORSHEDI, “EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TEMPORARY CEMENTS ON THE TENSILE STRENGTH OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED CROWNS,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 27, no. 2 (80), pp. 53–59, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/21778/en

Related Journal Papers