مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,417
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF 10 TOOTHBRUSH TYPES

Pages

  117-125

Abstract

 Aim: The aim of this investigation was to detennine the efficiency of several toothbrushes on plaque removal.Material and Methods: This single blind crossover clinical trial was carried out on 10 dental students of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. During the year 2000 (1379) cases were selected randomly from a group of volunteers. Each sample was examined under a dental chair light using a flat dental mirror, both before and after brushing. The modified steelman brushing method was employed to remove DENTAL PLAQUE with one of the following toothbrush: Oral-B, GUM, Crest, Jarda, Jordan, Mina, Laleh, Alfalij, Dr.Best, Mojan toothbrushes.Disclosing tablets were used to help identifying the plaque Index according to Turesky modification of Quigley and Hein Index (1962).Results: Analysis of the data using ANOVA test showed a significant difference between the level of cleaning at the buccal surfaces (p<0.02). However this difference was not significant between these groups at the lingual side using any of the brushes.Conclusion: Oral-B toothbrush was found to be significantly more efficient compared to other toothbrushes in its clinical perfonnance.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOFID, R., MALEKI, Z., EHSANI, S., & GHOLINIA KOJIDI, F.. (2003). COMPARISON OF THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF 10 TOOTHBRUSH TYPES. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 21(1), 117-125. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/21983/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOFID R., MALEKI Z., EHSANI S., GHOLINIA KOJIDI F.. COMPARISON OF THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF 10 TOOTHBRUSH TYPES. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2003;21(1):117-125. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/21983/en

    IEEE: Copy

    R. MOFID, Z. MALEKI, S. EHSANI, and F. GHOLINIA KOJIDI, “COMPARISON OF THE CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF 10 TOOTHBRUSH TYPES,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 117–125, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/21983/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button