مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

774
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A SURVEY OF THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES OF SEYYED MURTAZA'S JURISPRUDENTIAL INFERENCES IN AT-NASIRIYYAT

Pages

  127-148

Abstract

 Amongst jurisprudents, it is well-known that "the most informed jurisprudent is the most familiar person with jurisprudential disputes". One who has considered all the jurisprudential views of leaders and specialists of schools and their arguments and has accepted a special jurisprudential view reasonably, he has surely had more jurisprudential knowledge. Amongst Imamite scholars, SEYYED MURTAZA (d. 436 AH) is one of the first jurisprudents who has discussed different jurisprudential views and has written some books about COMPARATIVE JURISPRUDENCE. Amongst his books in this genre, the most important after Intisar is Masa’il Al.-Nasiriyyat which is composed to explain and sometimes criticize the jurisprudential views of his great grandfather (from his mother side), namely Nasir utroush. This paper concerns to study the methodology of SEYYED MURTAZA in his argumentations and deductions with emphasis on his jurisprudential sources and proofs.Considering Intisar and other jurisprudential sources of SEYYED MURTAZA, "the CONSENSUS of Imamite scholars" and sometimes" the CONSENSUS of Ahl Al-Bayt (AS)" has had a special place in his jurisprudential and theological views and it is employed to feel the need for legitimacy in absence of isolated tradition which is not accepted by SEYYED MURTAZA and his master Sheikh Mufid, Of course SEYYED MURTAZA claims that the main source of Imamite jurisprudents is unanimous traditions. and he tries to improve lmamite jurisprudential positions on the basis of Kitab (Quran) and traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), even ISOLATED TRADITIONS, and JURISPRUDENTIAL ANALOGY which are not accepted by Imamite scholors or SEYYED MURTAZA and his master Sheikh Mufid.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHARIATMADARI, HAMID REZA. (2014). A SURVEY OF THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES OF SEYYED MURTAZA'S JURISPRUDENTIAL INFERENCES IN AT-NASIRIYYAT. ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCH, 9(4), 127-148. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/220980/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHARIATMADARI HAMID REZA. A SURVEY OF THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES OF SEYYED MURTAZA'S JURISPRUDENTIAL INFERENCES IN AT-NASIRIYYAT. ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCH[Internet]. 2014;9(4):127-148. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/220980/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HAMID REZA SHARIATMADARI, “A SURVEY OF THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES OF SEYYED MURTAZA'S JURISPRUDENTIAL INFERENCES IN AT-NASIRIYYAT,” ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCH, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 127–148, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/220980/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button