ANALYSIS OF THE INTELLECTUAL INTUITION IN KANT AND FICHTE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MEMARI ZOHRE; TALEBZADEH HAMID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: QARBSHENASI-YE BONYADI (OCCIDENTAL STUDIES) Year:2016 | Volume:7 | Issue:1 Page(s): 133-166

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,354

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ANALYSIS OF THE INTELLECTUAL INTUITION IN KANT AND FICHTE

Author(s)

MEMARI ZOHRE | TALEBZADEH HAMID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INTELLECTUAL INTUITIONQ2

KANTQ2

FICHTEQ2

CONSTITUTIVE IQ1

REGULATIVE IQ1

Abstract

Johann Gottlieb FICHTE, one of the KANT's followers and founders of German idealism, claimed that is the only philosopher that found the spirit of KANT's philosophy. Despite this claim, he is opposed to KANT in some of the most important issues. One of them is the problem of INTELLECTUAL INTUITION. KANT explicitly disputes the INTELLECTUAL INTUITION, whereas FICHTE bases the consciousness on it and even he proves that without the INTELLECTUAL INTUITION the knowledge is impossible in human kind.He asserts that INTELLECTUAL INTUITION in his opinion is something different from KANT's and it' sname is the only common factor between them. He also says that KANT agrees with him and even this point is the spirit of the first critiques.This assay is to study this issue and clarify the subject matter, then it turns out that in the point of INTELLECTUAL INTUITION, spite common denominator between them, Fiche disagrees KANT. There is a difference of opinion in respect of "transcendental I". In this case what KANT explicitly denied is the same as FICHTE proves.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MEMARI, ZOHRE, & TALEBZADEH, HAMID. (2016). ANALYSIS OF THE INTELLECTUAL INTUITION IN KANT AND FICHTE. QARBSHENASI-YE BONYADI (OCCIDENTAL STUDIES), 7(1), 133-166. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/221110/en

Vancouver: Copy

MEMARI ZOHRE, TALEBZADEH HAMID. ANALYSIS OF THE INTELLECTUAL INTUITION IN KANT AND FICHTE. QARBSHENASI-YE BONYADI (OCCIDENTAL STUDIES)[Internet]. 2016;7(1):133-166. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/221110/en

IEEE: Copy

ZOHRE MEMARI, and HAMID TALEBZADEH, “ANALYSIS OF THE INTELLECTUAL INTUITION IN KANT AND FICHTE,” QARBSHENASI-YE BONYADI (OCCIDENTAL STUDIES), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 133–166, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/221110/en

Related Journal Papers