CLINICAL EVALUATION OF MTA AND AMALGAM AS A RETROFILLING MATERIAL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHAZIYANI P.; SAFAEE H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental School Year:2003 | Volume:21 | Issue:3 Page(s): 383-391

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,040

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF MTA AND AMALGAM AS A RETROFILLING MATERIAL

Author(s)

GHAZIYANI P. | SAFAEE H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RETROFILL MATERIALQ4

MTAQ4

AMALGAMQ4

Abstract

Background & Aim: It is essential to use a reliable RETROFILL MATERIAL in surgical endodontics in order to gain successful results. Past investigations showed that none of the available materials are ideal. AMALGAM has been accepted as a RETROFILL MATERIAL for many years. MTA has been suggested as a better replacement for AMALGAM recently. There has not been any report on MTA usage in human. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of AMALGAM and MTA as a RETROFILL MATERIAL.Method & Material: In order to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of AMALGAM and MTA as a RETROFILL MATERIAL we followed 56 patients (72 roots) who had received surgically retrofilled treatment during the past three years.Results: In respect to the standard criteria for success and failure related to endodontics we found that 84.3% (43 roots) of AMALGAM refrofilled roots and 71.4% (15 roots) of MTA were categorized as successful cases.5.9% (3 roots) with AMALGAM and 14.3%(3 roots) with MTA were classified as failure treatment. 9.8% (5 roots) with AMALGAM and 14.3% (3 roots) \\ith MTA were considered uncel1aincases.Statistical analysis using chi square test revealed that there was not any significant differences (P>0.05) between AMALGAM and MTA as a RETROFILL MATERIAL.Conclusion: Further investigations need to carry out in order to compare the success and failure of MTA and anialgam in human. Our clinical study showed no significant difference between MTA and AMALGAM as a RETROFILL MATERIAL.

Cites

INVITRO STUDY OF APICAL MICRO-LEAKAGE OF THREE MATERIALS: GRAY MTA, WHITE MTA AND PORTLAND CEMENT

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHAZIYANI, P., & SAFAEE, H.. (2003). CLINICAL EVALUATION OF MTA AND AMALGAM AS A RETROFILLING MATERIAL. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 21(3), 383-391. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/22169/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHAZIYANI P., SAFAEE H.. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF MTA AND AMALGAM AS A RETROFILLING MATERIAL. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2003;21(3):383-391. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/22169/en

IEEE: Copy

P. GHAZIYANI, and H. SAFAEE, “CLINICAL EVALUATION OF MTA AND AMALGAM AS A RETROFILLING MATERIAL,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 383–391, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/22169/en

Related Journal Papers