مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

949
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DEBRIS AND SMEAR LAYER REMAINING IN ROOT CANAL WALL AFTER PREPARATION WITH ROTARY AND HAND INSTRUMENTS IN CURVED CANALS

Pages

  526-532

Abstract

 Background & Aim: The purpose of this scanning electron microscope (SEM) study was to compare the CLEANLINESS of the root canal walls following either a manual or a ROTARY TECHNIQUE of canal instrumentation. The hypothesis was that a ROTARY TECHNIQUE would produce a cleaner root canal. Methods & Materials: Manual filing was performed on 24 extracted teeth with the curvature more than 20˚ using stainless steel K-flexofile (DENTSPLY MAILLEFER). Powered instrumentation was carried out on a further 24 extracted teeth, using HERO 642 (Micro Mega France) NICKEL-TITANIUM files in a handpiece NSK (ENDO-MAT TC) (375 r.p.m) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A normal saline solution was used for irrigation. The roots were cut longitudinally and the canal walls were examined for debris and smear layer at the apical, middle and coronal level.Results: When using ROTARY TECHNIQUE, significant superiority was seen in removal of debris (p<0.05). But, the two groups didn't have significant difference with reference to smear layer. The three region examined in each group didn't have significant differences with regard to debris and smear layer.Conclusion: The ROTARY TECHNIQUE employed in this study produced cleaner root canal walls than the manual SS K-flexofile instrumentation.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ASNA ASHARI, M., ABEDI, A.H., & MOZAYENI, M.A.. (2006). COMPARISON OF DEBRIS AND SMEAR LAYER REMAINING IN ROOT CANAL WALL AFTER PREPARATION WITH ROTARY AND HAND INSTRUMENTS IN CURVED CANALS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 23(4 (66)), 526-532. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/22233/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ASNA ASHARI M., ABEDI A.H., MOZAYENI M.A.. COMPARISON OF DEBRIS AND SMEAR LAYER REMAINING IN ROOT CANAL WALL AFTER PREPARATION WITH ROTARY AND HAND INSTRUMENTS IN CURVED CANALS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2006;23(4 (66)):526-532. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/22233/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. ASNA ASHARI, A.H. ABEDI, and M.A. MOZAYENI, “COMPARISON OF DEBRIS AND SMEAR LAYER REMAINING IN ROOT CANAL WALL AFTER PREPARATION WITH ROTARY AND HAND INSTRUMENTS IN CURVED CANALS,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCHOOL SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, vol. 23, no. 4 (66), pp. 526–532, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/22233/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button