مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

3,815
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

CONCEPT OF STATE IN THE JUDICIAL PRECEDENT OF THE COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE

Pages

  1-33

Abstract

 Concept of STATE is one of the multi-dimensional concepts of the Science of Law. One of its dimensions is to consider a STATE as a manifestation of sovereign political body or as the executive power. In the Iranian judicial system, the Court of Administrative Justice (CAJ) is the judicial body which deals with complaints lodged by the people against governmental officers and units. Since claims are made against the STATE, it is necessary to define the concept of STATE from the viewpoint of the CAJ. This definition has impact on the determination of the STATE’s jurisdiction and its legal status and even on individuals lodging complaints against the STATE. This paper basically examines the following question: Is “STATE” in the CAJ’s judicial precedent considered as the whole sovereign body or as the executive power? In addition, this paper investigates what is the meaning of the STATE in such precedent. It also responds to the following questions: Does any organization, unit or company which can be described as governmental can be considered as part of the STATE or should such bodies or their capitals belong to the STATE to be considered as governmental? How does the CAJ deal with complaints in accordance with its definition of the concept of STATE? How does the CAJ refrain from dealing with some claims by certain bodies, on the ground that it considers them as governmental? How does such interpretation affect the jurisdiction of the CAJ and general courts and the rights of people and governmental organizations and units? In this paper, the CAJ’s judgments are divided into two categories, depending on unidimensional and dual dimensional concepts of STATE, and then these judgments are analysed.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

OSTOVAR SANGARI, K.. (2011). CONCEPT OF STATE IN THE JUDICIAL PRECEDENT OF THE COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE. LEGAL STUDIES (JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES OF SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY), 3(1 (4)), 1-33. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/223496/en

Vancouver: Copy

OSTOVAR SANGARI K.. CONCEPT OF STATE IN THE JUDICIAL PRECEDENT OF THE COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE. LEGAL STUDIES (JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES OF SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY)[Internet]. 2011;3(1 (4)):1-33. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/223496/en

IEEE: Copy

K. OSTOVAR SANGARI, “CONCEPT OF STATE IN THE JUDICIAL PRECEDENT OF THE COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE,” LEGAL STUDIES (JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES OF SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY), vol. 3, no. 1 (4), pp. 1–33, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/223496/en

Related Journal Papers

Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button