مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

880
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ANALYZING BIRGER HJØRLAND VIEWS AND OPINIONS ON KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION

Pages

  13-29

Abstract

 Purpose: To describe four epistemological positions of EMPIRICISM, RATIONALISM, HISTORICISM, and PRAGMATISM in KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION domain and explaining and analyzing six approaches to KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION (automatic versus human classification, user-based and cognitive classifications, facet classification, bibliometric classification and domain-analytic classification) based on BIRGER HJØRLAND’s theory.Methodology: Theoretical analysis.Results: Empiricist position results in classification according to formal similarities of resources. RATIONALISM led to systems with facet classification. HISTORICISM driven systems deal with knowledge development and communities and systems holding practical approach take cultural background and critical classification. Hjørland’s theory analysis reveals the mutual relationship between automatic and human classification, compatibility among searcher and KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION system, subject retrieval improvement, guiding specialized activities of the field, employing bibliography methods and so on.Conclusion: Taking epistemological position in KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION domain helps in analyzing issues of the field and provides theoretical basis for judgment.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHABANI, A., NAJAFI, N., HOSSEINI, SH., & AZARGOON, MARYAM. (2016). ANALYZING BIRGER HJ?RLAND VIEWS AND OPINIONS ON KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION. LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION), 27(3), 13-29. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/224231/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHABANI A., NAJAFI N., HOSSEINI SH., AZARGOON MARYAM. ANALYZING BIRGER HJ?RLAND VIEWS AND OPINIONS ON KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION. LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION)[Internet]. 2016;27(3):13-29. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/224231/en

    IEEE: Copy

    A. SHABANI, N. NAJAFI, SH. HOSSEINI, and MARYAM AZARGOON, “ANALYZING BIRGER HJ?RLAND VIEWS AND OPINIONS ON KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION,” LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION), vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 13–29, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/224231/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button