THE EFFICIENCY OF LANGUAGE FIELD FOR RETRIEVING FARSI AND ARABIC RESULTS IN SEARCH ENGINES (COMPARATIVE STUDY: GOOGLE, BING, & YAHOO)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

YAGHTIN M.; JOKAR A.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION) Year:2017 | Volume:28 | Issue:2 (110) Page(s): 161-175

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

621

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EFFICIENCY OF LANGUAGE FIELD FOR RETRIEVING FARSI AND ARABIC RESULTS IN SEARCH ENGINES (COMPARATIVE STUDY: GOOGLE, BING, & YAHOO)

Author(s)

YAGHTIN M. | JOKAR A.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SEARCH ENGINEQ2

LANGUAGE RESTRICTIONQ1

EFFICIENCYQ2

INFORMATION RETRIEVALQ2

RESULTS RANKINGQ1

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the EFFICIENCY of the LANGUAGE RESTRICTION feature in Google, Bing and Yahoo SEARCH ENGINEs and to determine the most efficient SEARCH ENGINE in retrieving relevant results in Farsi and Arabic.Methodology: A survey on a sample of 38 homonyms with different meanings in Farsi and Arabic.Results: Google SEARCH ENGINE showed a lower performance compared to the other two SEARCH ENGINEs in terms of the number of results retrieved and ranking the relevant results to the target language. There was no significant difference among the three SEARCH ENGINEs in retrieving irrelevant results to the target language. However, a significant difference was seen among Google and the other SEARCH ENGINEs in ranking the irrelevant results to the target language. Also, no relationship was found between the performance of the SEARCH ENGINEs in retrieving irrelevant results to the target language and traffic and popularity of irrelevant pages.Conclusion: Those using the LANGUAGE RESTRICTION feature for Farsi and Arabic are more likely to see relevant results in Yahoo and Bing SEARCH ENGINEs.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

YAGHTIN, M., & JOKAR, A.R.. (2017). THE EFFICIENCY OF LANGUAGE FIELD FOR RETRIEVING FARSI AND ARABIC RESULTS IN SEARCH ENGINES (COMPARATIVE STUDY: GOOGLE, BING, & YAHOO). LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION), 28(2 (110) ), 161-175. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/224241/en

Vancouver: Copy

YAGHTIN M., JOKAR A.R.. THE EFFICIENCY OF LANGUAGE FIELD FOR RETRIEVING FARSI AND ARABIC RESULTS IN SEARCH ENGINES (COMPARATIVE STUDY: GOOGLE, BING, & YAHOO). LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION)[Internet]. 2017;28(2 (110) ):161-175. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/224241/en

IEEE: Copy

M. YAGHTIN, and A.R. JOKAR, “THE EFFICIENCY OF LANGUAGE FIELD FOR RETRIEVING FARSI AND ARABIC RESULTS IN SEARCH ENGINES (COMPARATIVE STUDY: GOOGLE, BING, & YAHOO),” LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION), vol. 28, no. 2 (110) , pp. 161–175, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/224241/en

Related Journal Papers