A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT THROUGH THE WORLD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MORADI S.; JANAVI E.; KAZEMI H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION) Year:2018 | Volume:28 | Issue:4 (112) Page(s): 75-94

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

998

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT THROUGH THE WORLD

Author(s)

MORADI S. | JANAVI E. | KAZEMI H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCTQ1

FRAUDQ1

DATA MANIPULATIONQ1

DATA FALSIFICATIONQ1

IRANQ2

MIDDLE EASTQ2

Abstract

Purpose: A comparative study of scientific misconduct in some countries, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Isreal, India, Pakistan, United States, China, Japan, South Korea, Sweden and France.Methodology: All retracted articles indexed in Web of Science between 2010 and 2017 were selected. Using analytical approach and Scientometrics method, the status of retracted papers in terms of cooperation with other countries, disciplines, retraction date, citation rate and types of retraction by separation of countries, scientific categories and disciplines were studied.Results: The top scientific misconduct was plagiarism and belonged to science branch fields. China had the most retracted papers in each discipline, domain and scientific category. The most retracted articles were written in Medical Sciences domain.Conclusion: There is an upward trend in papers getting retracted in recent years.Overall, Iran, India and Pakistan had the most scientific misconduct in compare to their total scientific production.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MORADI, S., JANAVI, E., & KAZEMI, H.. (2018). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT THROUGH THE WORLD. LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION), 28(4 (112) ), 75-94. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/224277/en

Vancouver: Copy

MORADI S., JANAVI E., KAZEMI H.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT THROUGH THE WORLD. LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION)[Internet]. 2018;28(4 (112) ):75-94. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/224277/en

IEEE: Copy

S. MORADI, E. JANAVI, and H. KAZEMI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT THROUGH THE WORLD,” LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION), vol. 28, no. 4 (112) , pp. 75–94, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/224277/en

Related Journal Papers