QUALITATIVE EVALUATION OF IRAN AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS’ WEBSITES BASED ON FAO CRITERIA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HAKIMI HOOSHANG; GILVARI ABBAS

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION) Year:2017 | Volume:28 | Issue:1 Page(s): 163-176

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

712

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

QUALITATIVE EVALUATION OF IRAN AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS’ WEBSITES BASED ON FAO CRITERIA

Author(s)

HAKIMI HOOSHANG | GILVARI ABBAS | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONQ1

WEBSITEQ1

EVALUATIONQ2

RANKINGQ2

FAO CRITERIAQ1

Abstract

Purpose: Qualitative EVALUATION of Iran AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONs’ WEBSITEs based on FAO CRITERIA.Methodology: In this survey, 32 WEBSITEs of AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONs around Iran were evaluated based on 118 standard qualitative criteria from FAO.Results: 59% of WEBSITEs were in a "suitable" condition, 46.87% were in "Average" and 3.13% in "weak" level. Hormozgan WEBSITE ranked first among all with 442 points followed by Ilam and West Azerbaijan jointly (439 points) and Khorasan with 438 points. The main problems of WEBSITEs were weakness in user interface and technical matters, accessibility and usability deficiencies, empty pages, disobeying the copyright law and low-quality content.Conclusion: Noncompliance to standards is the main problem in half of WEBSITEs. So, the WEBSITEs need to be revised and reformed based on FAO CRITERIA –the international reference and standard in agriculture field.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HAKIMI, HOOSHANG, & GILVARI, ABBAS. (2017). QUALITATIVE EVALUATION OF IRAN AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS’ WEBSITES BASED ON FAO CRITERIA. LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION), 28(1), 163-176. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/224346/en

Vancouver: Copy

HAKIMI HOOSHANG, GILVARI ABBAS. QUALITATIVE EVALUATION OF IRAN AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS’ WEBSITES BASED ON FAO CRITERIA. LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION)[Internet]. 2017;28(1):163-176. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/224346/en

IEEE: Copy

HOOSHANG HAKIMI, and ABBAS GILVARI, “QUALITATIVE EVALUATION OF IRAN AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS’ WEBSITES BASED ON FAO CRITERIA,” LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION STUDIES (JOURNAL OF NATIONAL STUDIES ON LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION ORGANIZATION), vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 163–176, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/224346/en

Related Journal Papers