A CRITICAL STUDY ON VARIOUS VIEWS OF DISPUTABLE POINT IN SADRA’S PRIMACY OF EXISTENCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BONYANI MOHAMMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal Ontological Researches Year:2014 | Volume:3 | Issue:5 Page(s): 107-124

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

557

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL STUDY ON VARIOUS VIEWS OF DISPUTABLE POINT IN SADRA’S PRIMACY OF EXISTENCE

Author(s)

BONYANI MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FUNDAMENTALITY OF EXISTENCEQ2

MENTALITY OF QUIDDITYQ2

PLACE FOR DISPUTEQ2

MOLLA SADRAQ2

Abstract

When studying Sadra’s view on FUNDAMENTALITY OF EXISTENCE, one should explain the point of dispute at first and, then, take a position. In Sadra’s system of thought there can be found two meanings for fundamentality and mentality. In one meaning, fundamentality means the state of being actualized and realized in outer world while mentality means not being actualized so. In another, by fundamentality is meant being actualized in itself and by mentality being accidentally actualized. Primacy of existence and MENTALITY OF QUIDDITY have two meanings in Transcendent philosophy (al-Hikmah al-muta’aliya): the first is that the concept of existence has referent in the external world but that of quiddity does not. The second is that existence and quiddity both have referents in the external world, while existence is actualized by itself but quiddity by existence. Of the two, only the former can be attendant in the disputable point. There are five meanings for existence in Transcendent philosophy and four meanings may be found for quiddity in philosophical works of which only one can be raised in the debatable point. MullaSadrā doesn’t clarify this position and, therefore, several inconsistent concepts of debatable point have appeared in the field.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BONYANI, MOHAMMAD. (2014). A CRITICAL STUDY ON VARIOUS VIEWS OF DISPUTABLE POINT IN SADRA’S PRIMACY OF EXISTENCE. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, 3(5), 107-124. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/226078/en

Vancouver: Copy

BONYANI MOHAMMAD. A CRITICAL STUDY ON VARIOUS VIEWS OF DISPUTABLE POINT IN SADRA’S PRIMACY OF EXISTENCE. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2014;3(5):107-124. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/226078/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD BONYANI, “A CRITICAL STUDY ON VARIOUS VIEWS OF DISPUTABLE POINT IN SADRA’S PRIMACY OF EXISTENCE,” JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 107–124, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/226078/en

Related Journal Papers