مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,143
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

JURISPRUDENTIAL REFLECTION ON THE NATURE OF PIMPING

Pages

  151-180

Abstract

 Article 135 of the Penal Code ratified in 1370 defines PIMPING as “linking together two or more people for ADULTERY or SODOMY”. Article 242 of the new Penal Code (ratified in 1392) has confirmed the following provisions of the previous article in different terms, but with little change in the content: "PIMPING is bringing two or more persons to commit ADULTERY or SODOMY". Contents of the two articles indicate the agreement of well-known Imamie jurists or at least the most widely accepted of them. In contrast, a significant number of jurists have developed the meaning of PIMPING. They believe that the absolute concept of bringing together and making a relationship, whether it would be for ADULTERY or SODOMY or LESBIANISM are to be regarded as instances of PIMPING.The author has given a third quote by doing a review of this issue. He believes that PIMPING as a crime with its punishments mentioned in jus canonical, has only one sense that includes" making a relationship for fornication or ADULTERY" and other items are different from that and are crimes which have been entrusted to the judge. It seems that the author's opinion of this theory is solitary. This paper defends the author's position by criticizing his rivals followed by the necessary supporting evidence.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MUHSINI DIHKALANI, MUHAMMAD. (2014). JURISPRUDENTIAL REFLECTION ON THE NATURE OF PIMPING. ISLAMIC LAW RESEARCH JOURNAL, 14(2 (38) ), 151-180. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/229398/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MUHSINI DIHKALANI MUHAMMAD. JURISPRUDENTIAL REFLECTION ON THE NATURE OF PIMPING. ISLAMIC LAW RESEARCH JOURNAL[Internet]. 2014;14(2 (38) ):151-180. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/229398/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MUHAMMAD MUHSINI DIHKALANI, “JURISPRUDENTIAL REFLECTION ON THE NATURE OF PIMPING,” ISLAMIC LAW RESEARCH JOURNAL, vol. 14, no. 2 (38) , pp. 151–180, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/229398/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button