HOW RIVAL COUNTRY AND POSSIBILITY OF FIGHT-BACK STRATEGY AFFECT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SANCTION REGIME: CASE OF IRAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KARIMI MOHAMMAD SADEGH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: STRATEGIC STUDIES OF PUBLIC POLICY (STRATEGIC STUDIES OF GLOBALIZATION JOURNAL) Year:2017 | Volume:7 | Issue:24 Page(s): 179-200

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

600

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HOW RIVAL COUNTRY AND POSSIBILITY OF FIGHT-BACK STRATEGY AFFECT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SANCTION REGIME: CASE OF IRAN

Author(s)

KARIMI MOHAMMAD SADEGH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SANCTIONSQ2

GAME THEORYQ2

FIGHT-BACK STRATEGYQ1

RIVAL COUNTRYQ1

IRAN SANCTIONSQ1

Abstract

SANCTIONS are considered as a foreign policy tool. Theoretical studies on SANCTIONS have investigated different aspects of the issues. These discussed aspects include the effectiveness of the SANCTIONS and how it affects the behavior of the target country. But the effects of the possibility of first, FIGHT-BACK STRATEGY for the target country, and second, the presence of rival countries have been discussed unlikely. GAME THEORY is used to address these two deficiencies. Six games which differ in the number of stages, how the pay-offs are calculated, and the presence of a RIVAL COUNTRY are studied. The results show that fight back ability provides the target with the opportunity to change the sender’ s calculation. It also reduces the probability of SANCTIONS. However, the presence of a RIVAL COUNTRY neutralizes this opportunity and makes it easier for the sender country to put SANCTIONS into force. In addition, a minimum extent of the SANCTIONS was deduced for the sender country to enter a SANCTIONS episode.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KARIMI, MOHAMMAD SADEGH. (2017). HOW RIVAL COUNTRY AND POSSIBILITY OF FIGHT-BACK STRATEGY AFFECT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SANCTION REGIME: CASE OF IRAN. STRATEGIC STUDIES OF PUBLIC POLICY (STRATEGIC STUDIES OF GLOBALIZATION JOURNAL), 7(24 ), 179-200. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/229906/en

Vancouver: Copy

KARIMI MOHAMMAD SADEGH. HOW RIVAL COUNTRY AND POSSIBILITY OF FIGHT-BACK STRATEGY AFFECT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SANCTION REGIME: CASE OF IRAN. STRATEGIC STUDIES OF PUBLIC POLICY (STRATEGIC STUDIES OF GLOBALIZATION JOURNAL)[Internet]. 2017;7(24 ):179-200. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/229906/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD SADEGH KARIMI, “HOW RIVAL COUNTRY AND POSSIBILITY OF FIGHT-BACK STRATEGY AFFECT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SANCTION REGIME: CASE OF IRAN,” STRATEGIC STUDIES OF PUBLIC POLICY (STRATEGIC STUDIES OF GLOBALIZATION JOURNAL), vol. 7, no. 24 , pp. 179–200, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/229906/en

Related Journal Papers