مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,993
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE OF GEORG SIMMEL’S VIEWS ON RELIGION, THE RATIO BETWEEN RELIGION AND RELIGIOSITY IN GEORG SIMMEL’S FORMAL SOCIOLOGY

Pages

  35-48

Abstract

 Gorge Simmel is one of the most abstruse classical sociologists who like all other sociologists has entered the realm of RELIGION and reviewed it within his own invented sociological framework of FORM and Content. Based on his reconstructed Neo-Kant theory of FORM and Content, Simmel interprets FORM as OBJECT and Content as SUBJECT, showing the DIALECTICal conversion of OBJECTs to SUBJECTs and SUBJECT to OBJECTs. That RELIGIOSITY has a concept independent of RELIGION, that RELIGIOSITY had existed before RELIGIONs come exist and that RELIGIOSITY will continue to exist even if RELIGIONs stop to exist are among the issues that have put Simmel in a position opposite to that of other thinkers. This research by reviewing Georg Simmel's works on RELIGION and RELIGIOSITY and making a comparison with reasoning of other sociologists of his time seeks to answer the following questions: ·Which is the ration between RELIGION and RELIGIOSITY in Georg Simmel's FORMal sociology.·Can RELIGION a RELIGIOSITY cause a DIALECTICal shift from FORM to Content and from Content to FORM.·Can RELIGIOSITY have an independent identity apart from RELIGION.·Is RELIGION a factual truth or Mental constructed.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KHANI, ALIREZA, & NOURBAKHSH, YOUNES. (2016). A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE OF GEORG SIMMEL’S VIEWS ON RELIGION, THE RATIO BETWEEN RELIGION AND RELIGIOSITY IN GEORG SIMMEL’S FORMAL SOCIOLOGY. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES (JISDS), 8(2 (30)), 35-48. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/231994/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KHANI ALIREZA, NOURBAKHSH YOUNES. A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE OF GEORG SIMMEL’S VIEWS ON RELIGION, THE RATIO BETWEEN RELIGION AND RELIGIOSITY IN GEORG SIMMEL’S FORMAL SOCIOLOGY. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES (JISDS)[Internet]. 2016;8(2 (30)):35-48. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/231994/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALIREZA KHANI, and YOUNES NOURBAKHSH, “A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE OF GEORG SIMMEL’S VIEWS ON RELIGION, THE RATIO BETWEEN RELIGION AND RELIGIOSITY IN GEORG SIMMEL’S FORMAL SOCIOLOGY,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES (JISDS), vol. 8, no. 2 (30), pp. 35–48, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/231994/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button