COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMITTEES’ POSITION AT NATIONAL PROGRAMS OF EVALUATION AND ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS IN IRAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NASIRIPOUR A.A.; KEIKAVOOSI ARANI L.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Healthcare Management Research Year:2015 | Volume:5 | Issue:4 (SERIAL 14) Page(s): 15-22

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

915

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMITTEES’ POSITION AT NATIONAL PROGRAMS OF EVALUATION AND ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS IN IRAN

Author(s)

NASIRIPOUR A.A. | KEIKAVOOSI ARANI L. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HOSPITAL COMMITTEEQ2

EVALUATION PROGRAMQ2

ACCREDITATIONQ1

HOSPITALQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays, HOSPITALs allocate considerable resources to encourage different HOSPITAL wards in the form of multilateral cooperation groups and committees to improve performance quality. This study was designed to compare the HOSPITAL COMMITTEEs’ position at both the national evaluation and ACCREDITATION programs in Iran.Methods: This was a descriptive – comparative study. To gather data a researcher-developed checklist was developed based on committees’ standards evaluation and ACCREDITATION programs in Iran with 101 questions and 11 dimensions such as name of active HOSPITAL COMMITTEEs (11 questions), aim (11 questions), duties (5 questions), … Without Adaptability, Partial Adaptability and Complete Adaptability for standards were writhed. Data was analyzed by means of descriptive statistics and comparative tables.Results: HOSPITAL COMMITTEEs in the national evaluation and ACCREDITATION programs were 23% Without Adaptability, 54% Partial Adaptability and 23% Complete Adaptability. Also based on aims and tasks, the number of members and method ... were 80% Without Adaptability, 10% Partial Adaptability, 10% Complete Adaptability.Conclusion: It seems that in order to adapt national ACCREDITATION program with international ACCREDITATION programs it is better remove committees’ position at national ACCREDITATION program and delegate the duties of committees to the relevant units.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NASIRIPOUR, A.A., & KEIKAVOOSI ARANI, L.. (2015). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMITTEES’ POSITION AT NATIONAL PROGRAMS OF EVALUATION AND ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS IN IRAN. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (JOURNAL OF HEALTH SYSTEM), 5(4 (SERIAL 14)), 15-22. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/232380/en

Vancouver: Copy

NASIRIPOUR A.A., KEIKAVOOSI ARANI L.. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMITTEES’ POSITION AT NATIONAL PROGRAMS OF EVALUATION AND ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS IN IRAN. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (JOURNAL OF HEALTH SYSTEM)[Internet]. 2015;5(4 (SERIAL 14)):15-22. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/232380/en

IEEE: Copy

A.A. NASIRIPOUR, and L. KEIKAVOOSI ARANI, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMMITTEES’ POSITION AT NATIONAL PROGRAMS OF EVALUATION AND ACCREDITATION OF HOSPITALS IN IRAN,” JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (JOURNAL OF HEALTH SYSTEM), vol. 5, no. 4 (SERIAL 14), pp. 15–22, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/232380/en

Related Journal Papers