Text, Ego and “ People” in Mohammad Taghi Ghiassi’ s Interpretations

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOHAYMENI MAZIAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES Year:2018 | Volume:18 | Issue:3 Page(s): 135-164

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

399

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Text, Ego and “ People” in Mohammad Taghi Ghiassi’ s Interpretations

Author(s)

MOHAYMENI MAZIAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EgoQ1

TextQ2

PeopleQ1

ReadingQ1

Personal WritingQ1

Second WritingQ1

Mohammad Taghi GhiassQ1

Abstract

The Blind Owl of Hedayat, The Heavenly Kingdom of Bahram Sadeghi, poems of Sohrab Sepehri are Mohammad Taghi Ghiassi’ s efforts to access some Personal Writing through an interpretation of these works which are fundamentally paradoxical. If the “ second” character of interpretation writing is not in opposition to the writer’ s aspiration to singularity, the dispersion of interpretation Text would be a proof of the absence of the consciousness which assumes the innovatory order of speech and the original recomposition of knowledge. Ghiassi’ s Ego is too ingrained in his lent science to manipulate it. The elementary image of this science in the Text shows the Ego’ s disability in appropriation and subjectivity of a reason reached by the other in a step of his transcendental suspension. Ghiassi’ s interpretations search for their lever between two suspensions. His use of French theories for interpreting Iranian works is not for the purpose. The intention is to speak about somewhat physical presence of his Ego in the connecting process. This presence does not unify the Text; moreover, it enfeebles its consistency. There is no organic connection between the works and the theories. The unique connecting element is Ego, which cries its singularity in the climax of its dependence in someone else’ s speech. Belief in the superiority of the speechless Ego over the silent People seems paradoxical where the learned reason of Ego is inclined to vulgarity.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOHAYMENI, MAZIAR. (2018). Text, Ego and “ People” in Mohammad Taghi Ghiassi’ s Interpretations. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, 18(3 ), 135-164. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/235337/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOHAYMENI MAZIAR. Text, Ego and “ People” in Mohammad Taghi Ghiassi’ s Interpretations. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2018;18(3 ):135-164. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/235337/en

IEEE: Copy

MAZIAR MOHAYMENI, “Text, Ego and “ People” in Mohammad Taghi Ghiassi’ s Interpretations,” JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, vol. 18, no. 3 , pp. 135–164, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/235337/en

Related Journal Papers