مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,364
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTHROPOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY IN THE PARADIGMS OF POSITIVISM AND CRITICAL REALISM

Pages

  87-100

Abstract

 The present paper examines and comments on the anthropological and methodological foundations of two paradigms of POSITIVISM and REALISM/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> CRITICAL REALISM and their influence on one another. An argumentative-demonstrative method is used in this paper to demonstrate the idea that the components of each paradigm in an epistemic system are logically related and the acceptance of every component necessitates the acceptance of the other components. Since the paradigm of POSITIVISM has a mechanical attitude about man, it adopts a model taken from natural sciences in its methodological foundations, appeals to a kind of descriptive method as a reliable method free from value and considers quantitative method to be sufficient. On the other hand, since the paradigm of REALISM/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> CRITICAL REALISM considers man to have a social identity, it considers the presuppositions agreed upon by individuals in communicative action as one of the important elements of its methodological judgment in its method and since it has a realistic concern, it considers practical adequacy as another element of its methodological judgment. For gathering the data, this paradigm combines quantitative and qualitative methods and considers that neither of them can be sufficient by itself.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    FUTOOHIYAN, ALI, & ABDI, HASSAN. (2012). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTHROPOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY IN THE PARADIGMS OF POSITIVISM AND CRITICAL REALISM. MARIFAT I FARHANGI AND EJTEMAII, 3(3 (11)), 87-100. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/235440/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    FUTOOHIYAN ALI, ABDI HASSAN. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTHROPOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY IN THE PARADIGMS OF POSITIVISM AND CRITICAL REALISM. MARIFAT I FARHANGI AND EJTEMAII[Internet]. 2012;3(3 (11)):87-100. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/235440/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALI FUTOOHIYAN, and HASSAN ABDI, “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTHROPOLOGY AND METHODOLOGY IN THE PARADIGMS OF POSITIVISM AND CRITICAL REALISM,” MARIFAT I FARHANGI AND EJTEMAII, vol. 3, no. 3 (11), pp. 87–100, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/235440/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button