MOVING FROM CACISTOCRACY TOWARDS MERITOCRACY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF IRANIAN UNIVERSITY WOMEN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZAHEDI SHAMSOSSADAT

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PAZHUHESHNAME-YE ZANAN (WOMEN’S STUDIES) Year:2015 | Volume:6 | Issue:1 Page(s): 75-95

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

977

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MOVING FROM CACISTOCRACY TOWARDS MERITOCRACY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF IRANIAN UNIVERSITY WOMEN

Author(s)

ZAHEDI SHAMSOSSADAT | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

UNIVERSITY WOMENQ2

CACISTOCRACY- MERITOCRACY-GENDER DISCRIMINATIONQ2

PYRAMIDAL STRUCTUREQ2

TRAPEZOIDAL STRUCTUREQ2

Abstract

From among various types of managerial and administrative structures, two types have been effective both in the success and failure of organizations and communities. These two types arecacistocracy and meritocracy. In a cross-sectional study, the researcher studied a number of Iranian universities in terms of selection of administrative managers as well as cultural atmospheres governing them. With this end in view, these university (Tehran University, Shahid Beheshti University, and Allameh Tabatabai University) were studied in a twenty-year period. Considering cacistocracy and meritocracy, as two end points of a continuum, the proportion of election was significantly distant from meritocracy endpoint. It seems that if appointments had been done unbiasedly and impartially, the advancement of the universities would have accelerated and the balanced development of university system, and consequently the whole country, would have been realized more easily. At the end of the paper, a number of suggestions are offered hoping that through their enactment the existing distance from meritocracy endpoint in universities would be shortened, and the country can take full advantage of its expert human resources.

Cites

METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN GENDER STUDIES

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZAHEDI, SHAMSOSSADAT. (2015). MOVING FROM CACISTOCRACY TOWARDS MERITOCRACY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF IRANIAN UNIVERSITY WOMEN. PAZHUHESHNAME-YE ZANAN (WOMEN’S STUDIES), 6(1), 75-95. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/235733/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZAHEDI SHAMSOSSADAT. MOVING FROM CACISTOCRACY TOWARDS MERITOCRACY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF IRANIAN UNIVERSITY WOMEN. PAZHUHESHNAME-YE ZANAN (WOMEN’S STUDIES)[Internet]. 2015;6(1):75-95. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/235733/en

IEEE: Copy

SHAMSOSSADAT ZAHEDI, “MOVING FROM CACISTOCRACY TOWARDS MERITOCRACY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF IRANIAN UNIVERSITY WOMEN,” PAZHUHESHNAME-YE ZANAN (WOMEN’S STUDIES), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–95, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/235733/en

Related Journal Papers