مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,825
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

2

Information Journal Paper

Title

NURSING STUDENTS' PRACTICAL SKILLS: SELF-, PEER AND TEACHER EVALUATION, COMPLEMENTARY OR CONTRADICTORY?

Pages

  61-69

Abstract

 Introduction: Evaluation of the clinical skills of nurses and other healthcare professionals is a challenge. Studies indicate that methods used to evaluate NURSING STUDENTS’ skills are not appropriate to educational aims. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical skills of NURSING STUDENTS by themselves, peers and the clinical teacher in medical and surgical wards of hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences.Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to conduct this study. All junior NURSING STUDENTS attending a medical-surgical internship program were chosen. At the end of the internship program, students’ clinical skills were evaluated by themselves, peers and the clinical teacher. NURSING STUDENTS’ Clinical Skills’ Form was used for data collection and descriptive and inferential statistics were used for data analysis.Results: In the domains of clinical skills, and responsibility - respect, there were significant differences between the clinical teacher, peers, and students’ scores.However, no such a significant difference was reported between the scores of self and PEER EVALUATION. In the domains of clinical skills and communication, there were no significant differences between all scores. Moreover, in clinical skills and communication domains, a significant correlation was found between peer and self scores. In responsibility - respect and communication domains, a significant correlation was shown between the scores of self and clinical teacher.Conclusion: In order to improve students’ feelings of responsibility, critical thinking and communication skills, self-learning, and respect to others during the internship program, it is suggested to consider the self-, peer, and clinical teacher's evaluation as the student's activity in clinical practice.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MEHRDAD, N., BIGDELI, SH., & EBRAHIMI, H.. (2012). NURSING STUDENTS' PRACTICAL SKILLS: SELF-, PEER AND TEACHER EVALUATION, COMPLEMENTARY OR CONTRADICTORY?. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION (JNE), 1(1), 61-69. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/238379/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MEHRDAD N., BIGDELI SH., EBRAHIMI H.. NURSING STUDENTS' PRACTICAL SKILLS: SELF-, PEER AND TEACHER EVALUATION, COMPLEMENTARY OR CONTRADICTORY?. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION (JNE)[Internet]. 2012;1(1):61-69. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/238379/en

    IEEE: Copy

    N. MEHRDAD, SH. BIGDELI, and H. EBRAHIMI, “NURSING STUDENTS' PRACTICAL SKILLS: SELF-, PEER AND TEACHER EVALUATION, COMPLEMENTARY OR CONTRADICTORY?,” JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION (JNE), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/238379/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button