COMPARISON OF UPPER EXTREMITY FRACTURE IMPAIRMENT AND DISABILITY IN OPERATIVE AND NONE-OPERATIVE INTERVENTION GROUPS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Gallehdar kakhki Ehsan; KALANTARI MINOO; Jamebozorgi Aliasghar; AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN ALIREZA; MADADI FIROUZ

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Year:2016 | Volume:5 | Issue:2 Page(s): 115-121

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

692

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF UPPER EXTREMITY FRACTURE IMPAIRMENT AND DISABILITY IN OPERATIVE AND NONE-OPERATIVE INTERVENTION GROUPS

Author(s)

Keywords

UPPER EXTREMITYQ2

OPERATIVEQ3

AMA GUIDESQ1

Abstract

Background and Aims: UPPER EXTREMITY fractures are one of the most common fractures of musculoskeletal system. Medical interventions used for this fractures are "operative" and "none-operative". The main purpose of the present study was investigating fracture impairment and disability in two groups of OPERATIVE and none-operative interventions.Materials and Method: In the present descriptive study, 70 adults with UPPER EXTREMITY fracture were selected based on convenience sampling. Participants were then divided into two groups of "operative" (34 participants) and "none-operative" groups (36 participants). Impairment rate and disability score, evaluated using AMA GUIDES (6th ed.) and DASH, respectively, were compared in the two groups. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (v.19) through running independent t-test (p<0.05).Results: There was a significant difference in impairment rate between the two groups of OPERATIVE and none OPERATIVE interventions, but no significant difference was observed in the disability score between the two groups.Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that impairment of none-operative fractures was less than that of the OPERATIVE group. Since AMA is designed based on ICF, according to findings, it was observed to be a better and more comprehensive tool compared with DASH. Also, the results of the present study can be used for fracture management by rehabilitation clinicians.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Gallehdar kakhki, Ehsan, KALANTARI, MINOO, Jamebozorgi, Aliasghar, AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN, ALIREZA, & MADADI, FIROUZ. (2016). COMPARISON OF UPPER EXTREMITY FRACTURE IMPAIRMENT AND DISABILITY IN OPERATIVE AND NONE-OPERATIVE INTERVENTION GROUPS. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 5(2), 115-121. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/239662/en

Vancouver: Copy

Gallehdar kakhki Ehsan, KALANTARI MINOO, Jamebozorgi Aliasghar, AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN ALIREZA, MADADI FIROUZ. COMPARISON OF UPPER EXTREMITY FRACTURE IMPAIRMENT AND DISABILITY IN OPERATIVE AND NONE-OPERATIVE INTERVENTION GROUPS. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE[Internet]. 2016;5(2):115-121. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/239662/en

IEEE: Copy

Ehsan Gallehdar kakhki, MINOO KALANTARI, Aliasghar Jamebozorgi, ALIREZA AKBARZADEH BAGHBAN, and FIROUZ MADADI, “COMPARISON OF UPPER EXTREMITY FRACTURE IMPAIRMENT AND DISABILITY IN OPERATIVE AND NONE-OPERATIVE INTERVENTION GROUPS,” SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 115–121, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/239662/en

Related Journal Papers