AN INTRODUCTION TO HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGY OF REFORMS: ARGUMENT AGAINST THE NASSERI'S REFORM (1859-1862) BASED ON RATIONAL CHOICE APPROACH

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAVADI REYHANEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: SOCIAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN IRAN Year:2012 | Volume:1 | Issue:3 Page(s): 9-40

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

801

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN INTRODUCTION TO HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGY OF REFORMS: ARGUMENT AGAINST THE NASSERI'S REFORM (1859-1862) BASED ON RATIONAL CHOICE APPROACH

Author(s)

JAVADI REYHANEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

REFORMSQ2

RATIONAL CHOICEQ2

NASER AL-DIN SHAHQ2

MIRZA MALKOM KHANQ2

CONS OF THE REFORMQ2

FARAMOSHKHANEHQ2

Abstract

The following article aims to study one of the reformative periods (1859-1862) in Nasseri's Era which is mostly neglected. Applying RATIONAL CHOICE Theory I appealed to a narrative analysis of the arguments of cons by dividing the internal oppositions to three groups: clergymen, courtiers, and government officials. After analyzing the arguments of these three groups (based on John Stuart Mill's comparative method) there were common arguments among those groups who had discussed on: "endangerment of the kingdom of Nasser al-Din Shah" and "neglecting the traditions". "Incompatible of reformist performances with Islam", "a not religious reformist", "endangerment of the Imperial dynasty", "homeland security disturbance", "neglecting the opposition's position", "the concern of cultural mixing" and "The personal manner of the reformist himself" are the arguments which two groups are mentioned them. Also one of these groups refered to the arguments like "the economic performance of the reformist", "the loss of territorial integrity", "colonization of Iran", "the reformist's political dependency on Russia", and "neglecting the citizen's rights".

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAVADI, REYHANEH. (2012). AN INTRODUCTION TO HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGY OF REFORMS: ARGUMENT AGAINST THE NASSERI'S REFORM (1859-1862) BASED ON RATIONAL CHOICE APPROACH. SOCIAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN IRAN, 1(3), 9-40. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/242879/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAVADI REYHANEH. AN INTRODUCTION TO HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGY OF REFORMS: ARGUMENT AGAINST THE NASSERI'S REFORM (1859-1862) BASED ON RATIONAL CHOICE APPROACH. SOCIAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN IRAN[Internet]. 2012;1(3):9-40. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/242879/en

IEEE: Copy

REYHANEH JAVADI, “AN INTRODUCTION TO HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGY OF REFORMS: ARGUMENT AGAINST THE NASSERI'S REFORM (1859-1862) BASED ON RATIONAL CHOICE APPROACH,” SOCIAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN IRAN, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 9–40, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/242879/en

Related Journal Papers