COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH IN PRIORITIZING PROVINCES BASED ON CIVIL PROJECTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOHAMMADI ALI; SHOJAEE PAYAM; AKBARI ZAHRA; KAYEDAN BAHARE

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF THE MARCO AND STRATEGIC POLICIES Year:2016 | Volume:3 | Issue:12 Page(s): 27-50

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

702

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH IN PRIORITIZING PROVINCES BASED ON CIVIL PROJECTS

Author(s)

MOHAMMADI ALI | SHOJAEE PAYAM | AKBARI ZAHRA | KAYEDAN BAHARE | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FOURTH DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGQ2

CIVIL PROJECTSQ2

COMPARATIVE ANALYSISQ1

MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKINGQ1

Abstract

This paper is aimed at evaluating the province performance in Iran based on national CIVIL PROJECTS at the end of the FOURTH DEVELOPMENT PLANNING. Therefore, by using these projects evaluation indices, published from strategic planning and control adjutancy of president, prioritizing of the province at the end of the fourth development is done. The results obtained from decision making multi criteria approach, were assessed finally by MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING and COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS. MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING matrix based on 6 projects evaluation indices and data from 31 provinces in Iran were gathered, and by Shanon entropy the weight of these indices for each project evaluation criteria extracted. Consequently, VIKOR method is more preferable than TOPSIS method due to Compromise solution. Based on VIKOR approach, Ilam province, Khozestan province and Khorasan Razavi province and based on TOPSIS approach Semnan province, Hamedan province and Ilam province have the highest ranks respectively.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOHAMMADI, ALI, SHOJAEE, PAYAM, AKBARI, ZAHRA, & KAYEDAN, BAHARE. (2016). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH IN PRIORITIZING PROVINCES BASED ON CIVIL PROJECTS. JOURNAL OF THE MARCO AND STRATEGIC POLICIES, 3(12), 27-50. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/244344/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOHAMMADI ALI, SHOJAEE PAYAM, AKBARI ZAHRA, KAYEDAN BAHARE. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH IN PRIORITIZING PROVINCES BASED ON CIVIL PROJECTS. JOURNAL OF THE MARCO AND STRATEGIC POLICIES[Internet]. 2016;3(12):27-50. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/244344/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI MOHAMMADI, PAYAM SHOJAEE, ZAHRA AKBARI, and BAHARE KAYEDAN, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH IN PRIORITIZING PROVINCES BASED ON CIVIL PROJECTS,” JOURNAL OF THE MARCO AND STRATEGIC POLICIES, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 27–50, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/244344/en

Related Journal Papers