EXAMINATION AND CRITICISM OF PHILOPONUS’S THEORY OF MOVEMENT FROM AVICENNA’S POINT OF VIEW

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TAROMI ABBAS; CHAVOSHI JAFAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES) Year:2012 | Volume:- | Issue:66/1 Page(s): 109-131

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,079

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EXAMINATION AND CRITICISM OF PHILOPONUS’S THEORY OF MOVEMENT FROM AVICENNA’S POINT OF VIEW

Author(s)

TAROMI ABBAS | CHAVOSHI JAFAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NATURAL MOVEMENTQ2

CELESTIAL MOVEMENTQ2

EJECTION MOVEMENTQ2

EFFICIENT FORCEQ2

LEANINGQ2

Abstract

From Aristotle’s point of view, in ejection adversary movement, the movement is continued through transmitting driving force to the layers of intermediate environments. Yahya Nahvi criticizes Aristotle’s theory and believes that every movement, consisting of natural or adversary movement take place due to internal Dunamis Endotheisa, in addition contrary to Aristotle’s perception, the NATURAL MOVEMENT of objects is not for reaching a natural place and CELESTIAL MOVEMENT is not being continued due to environmental force but due to the transmission of a non-material force from motive to movable, a spontaneous movement is created in the movable and it causes the continuation of movement. There are many doubts and questions about Yahya Nahvi’s theory of movement: Is this internal force existent in the object before movement? If any, why has not the force not caused movement? If movement is spontaneous why is the movement of object stopped? Does the object consume its internal force spontaneously? After a criticism of Nahvi’s theory of movement, Avicenna propounds his theory which will be discussed in this article.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

TAROMI, ABBAS, & CHAVOSHI, JAFAR. (2012). EXAMINATION AND CRITICISM OF PHILOPONUS’S THEORY OF MOVEMENT FROM AVICENNA’S POINT OF VIEW. KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES), -(66/1), 109-131. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/248240/en

Vancouver: Copy

TAROMI ABBAS, CHAVOSHI JAFAR. EXAMINATION AND CRITICISM OF PHILOPONUS’S THEORY OF MOVEMENT FROM AVICENNA’S POINT OF VIEW. KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES)[Internet]. 2012;-(66/1):109-131. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/248240/en

IEEE: Copy

ABBAS TAROMI, and JAFAR CHAVOSHI, “EXAMINATION AND CRITICISM OF PHILOPONUS’S THEORY OF MOVEMENT FROM AVICENNA’S POINT OF VIEW,” KNOWLEDGE (JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES), vol. -, no. 66/1, pp. 109–131, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/248240/en

Related Journal Papers