THE COMPARISON OF ANTIBACTERIAL EFFECT OF PROPOLIS , SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 5.25%, AND CHLORHEXIDINE 2% AS INTRACANAL IRRIGANTS AGAINST ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS: AN EX VIVO STUDY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZARE JAHROMI MARYAM; TAHMOORESPOOR AREZOO; HEMMAT NADIA; MOGHADASI BROUJENI ELHAM; RANJBARIAN PARISA

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Caspian Journal of Dental Research Year:2017 | Volume:6 | Issue:1 Page(s): 29-35

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

945

Download:

239

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON OF ANTIBACTERIAL EFFECT OF PROPOLIS , SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 5.25%, AND CHLORHEXIDINE 2% AS INTRACANAL IRRIGANTS AGAINST ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS: AN EX VIVO STUDY

Author(s)

Keywords

ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALISQ3

PROPOLISQ3

SODIUM HYPOCHLORITEQ3

CHLORHEXIDINEQ3

ROOT CANAL THERAPYQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Debridement of root canal using appropriately safe and effective irrigants is the key factor for long-term success. Purpose of this study was to compare the antibacterial effect of PROPOLIS with 5.25% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE, and 2% CHLORHEXIDINE against ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS.Materials & Methods: In this study, 36 single-canal roots were used. The crown was removed and instrumentation was prepared by step-back technique, then teeth were sterilized and contaminated with E. Faecalis, and divided into four groups with 9 cases: group1: PROPOLIS, group2: 5.25% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE, group3: 2% CHLORHEXIDINE and group4: controls. Irrigants were injected by a 27-gauge syringe and roots were incubated in 37oC for one week. Sampling was done and inoculated to tryptone soy broth media, after 24 hours the turbidity was measured. Samples were also cultured on agar plates, and colony-forming units were counted as CFU/ml. Data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney test.Results: The difference between PROPOLIS with mean value of 246.77 colonies and CHLORHEXIDINE with mean value of zero colonies, was significant (P=.002). Similarly, the difference between CHLORHEXIDINE and SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE with mean value 203.55 of colonies was significant and they had significant difference in turbidity (P=.002), too. No significant difference was observed between PROPOLIS and SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE with regard to the induced colonies (P=0.781) and their turbidity (P=0.495).Conclusion: It can be concluded that antibacterial activity of 2% CHLORHEXIDINE against E. faecalis is more obvious than PROPOLIS or 5.25% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE. But antibacterial activity of PROPOLIS over 5.25% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE or vice versa was not confirmed.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

ZARE JAHROMI, MARYAM, TAHMOORESPOOR, AREZOO, HEMMAT, NADIA, MOGHADASI BROUJENI, ELHAM, & RANJBARIAN, PARISA. (2017). THE COMPARISON OF ANTIBACTERIAL EFFECT OF PROPOLIS , SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 5.25%, AND CHLORHEXIDINE 2% AS INTRACANAL IRRIGANTS AGAINST ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS: AN EX VIVO STUDY. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 6(1), 29-35. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/250233/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZARE JAHROMI MARYAM, TAHMOORESPOOR AREZOO, HEMMAT NADIA, MOGHADASI BROUJENI ELHAM, RANJBARIAN PARISA. THE COMPARISON OF ANTIBACTERIAL EFFECT OF PROPOLIS , SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 5.25%, AND CHLORHEXIDINE 2% AS INTRACANAL IRRIGANTS AGAINST ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS: AN EX VIVO STUDY. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2017;6(1):29-35. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/250233/en

IEEE: Copy

MARYAM ZARE JAHROMI, AREZOO TAHMOORESPOOR, NADIA HEMMAT, ELHAM MOGHADASI BROUJENI, and PARISA RANJBARIAN, “THE COMPARISON OF ANTIBACTERIAL EFFECT OF PROPOLIS , SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 5.25%, AND CHLORHEXIDINE 2% AS INTRACANAL IRRIGANTS AGAINST ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS: AN EX VIVO STUDY,” CASPIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/250233/en

Related Journal Papers