Comparative evaluation of self-adhering flowable and conventional flowable composites using different adhesive systems

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Rahmanifard Maede; KHODADADI EFFAT; KHAFRI SORAYA; EZOJI FARIBA

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Caspian Journal of Dental Research Year:2019 | Volume:8 | Issue:2 Page(s): 49-55

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

642

Download:

160

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparative evaluation of self-adhering flowable and conventional flowable composites using different adhesive systems

Author(s)

Rahmanifard Maede | KHODADADI EFFAT | KHAFRI SORAYA | EZOJI FARIBA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Composite resinsQ2

Dental leakageQ2

Dentin-bonding agentsQ2

Abstract

Introduction: The ability to seal margins is considered as one of the best predictors for the longterm success of bonded restorations. The aim of this study was to compare microleakage in occlusal and gingival margins between cavities filled with self-adhesive flowable and conventional flowable composites using dye penetration. Composite restorations were bonded with self-etch, total etch and universal adhesives. Materials & Methods: In this in vitro study, 32 extracted human premolars for orthodontic purpose were included. Class V cavities (3 ) were prepared on the facial and lingual surfaces of each tooth. The teeth were randomly divided into four equal groups based on the type of material: Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE), Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Tokyo, Japan), Universal Scotch Bond (3M ESPE), and Vertise Flow (Kerr Corp). Bonding agents were applied according to the manufacturer instructions. Then, the cavities of the first three groups were restored with Filtek Flow (3M ESPE, USA). In addition, the teeth were thermocycled for 30 seconds and 1000 cycles at 5°-55° C. Microleakage was evaluated using a stereomicroscope ( ). Specimens were subjected to a dye leakage test. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Significant difference was observed in microleakage among four groups in both occlusal and gingival levels (p≤ 0. 05). No significant difference was found regarding microleakage between Vertise Flow, and Etch-and-rinse and Universal groups. Conclusion: Vertise Flow is a useful material with adequate marginal seal.

Cites

Evaluation of self-adhering composite microleakage compared with tow conventional adhesive systems

References

In Vitro Microleakage of Class V Composite Restorations in Use of Three Adhesive Systems

Cite

APA: Copy

Rahmanifard, Maede, KHODADADI, EFFAT, KHAFRI, SORAYA, & EZOJI, FARIBA. (2019). Comparative evaluation of self-adhering flowable and conventional flowable composites using different adhesive systems. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 8(2 ), 49-55. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/250250/en

Vancouver: Copy

Rahmanifard Maede, KHODADADI EFFAT, KHAFRI SORAYA, EZOJI FARIBA. Comparative evaluation of self-adhering flowable and conventional flowable composites using different adhesive systems. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2019;8(2 ):49-55. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/250250/en

IEEE: Copy

Maede Rahmanifard, EFFAT KHODADADI, SORAYA KHAFRI, and FARIBA EZOJI, “Comparative evaluation of self-adhering flowable and conventional flowable composites using different adhesive systems,” CASPIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, vol. 8, no. 2 , pp. 49–55, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/250250/en

Related Journal Papers