مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

695
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CONFRONTATION BETWEEN TWO LEGAL PERSPECTIVES: ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL INTERACTION AND CONFLICT BETWEEN THE I.R. IRAN AND THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

Pages

  581-602

Abstract

 The United Nations HUMAN RIGHTS Council (UNHRC) is an inter-governmental body within the United Nations System, and is one of the most prominent institutions of the United Nations which monitor HUMAN RIGHTS records in member states. The UNHRC is the successor to the United Nations Commission on HUMAN RIGHTS (UNCHR), and is a subsidiary body of the United Nations General Assembly. It has addressed HUMAN RIGHTS status in IRAN mostly through UPR and Special Rapporteur. The Council works closely with the Office of the High Commissioner for HUMAN RIGHTS (OHCHR) and engages the United Nations' Special Procedures. The state of HUMAN RIGHTS in the Islamic Republic of IRAN and many other countries have been addressed both by UNHRC and NCHR. The Council and its predecessor have had confrontational and partly normal interactions with the I. R. of IRAN since 1979. This article reviews the mentioned interactions and focuses on their confrontational legal status on TORTURE, execution, ISLAMIC PUNISHMENTS and etc. It is believed that part of the confrontations stem from differences in legal systems and ambiguities in some of IRAN’s Penal Law.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    OMIDI, ALI, POORBAFRANI, HASSAN, & POURALI, IMAN. (2016). A CONFRONTATION BETWEEN TWO LEGAL PERSPECTIVES: ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL INTERACTION AND CONFLICT BETWEEN THE I.R. IRAN AND THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL. PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY, 46(3 ), 581-602. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/251139/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    OMIDI ALI, POORBAFRANI HASSAN, POURALI IMAN. A CONFRONTATION BETWEEN TWO LEGAL PERSPECTIVES: ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL INTERACTION AND CONFLICT BETWEEN THE I.R. IRAN AND THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL. PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY[Internet]. 2016;46(3 ):581-602. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/251139/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALI OMIDI, HASSAN POORBAFRANI, and IMAN POURALI, “A CONFRONTATION BETWEEN TWO LEGAL PERSPECTIVES: ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL INTERACTION AND CONFLICT BETWEEN THE I.R. IRAN AND THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL,” PUBLIC LAW STUDIES QUARTERLY, vol. 46, no. 3 , pp. 581–602, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/251139/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button