مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,558
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE PRACTICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL TOWARD ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

Pages

  691-707

Abstract

 Because of the importance of Human Rights issues, mechanisms and organizations established in this field have an especial importance too. The Human Rights Commission and the Human Rights Council substituted the former are two important mechanisms established in this respect by the U. N. The major functions of these organizations are development, promotion, protection and supervising Human Rights in member states of the U. N such as the Islamic Republic of Iran. The investigation of Human Rights situation in Iran started when the Human Rights Commission was established and continued when the Human Rights Council substituted in 2006. The main goal of the present research is to compare the practice of these two organizations toward Iran for finding the similarities and differences. Findings of the research show that despite of the organizational changing and developments in the Human Rights Council there are not considerable differences in the practice of the Human Rights Council compared to the Human Rights Commission; this means that the general political atmosphere and criticisms against Iran experienced in Human Rights Commission practice toward Iran continued in the practice of its substituted organization. Meanwhile Iran's attempts in establishing channels to affect the decisions of both organizations have not been successful. Research method in this research is analytical-descriptive and data gathering is based on library way.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ABBASZADEH FATHABADI, MEHDI, & Shojaee, Zahra. (2018). COMPARING THE PRACTICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL TOWARD ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 48(3 ), 691-707. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/110422/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ABBASZADEH FATHABADI MEHDI, Shojaee Zahra. COMPARING THE PRACTICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL TOWARD ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2018;48(3 ):691-707. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/110422/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MEHDI ABBASZADEH FATHABADI, and Zahra Shojaee, “COMPARING THE PRACTICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL TOWARD ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN,” POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, vol. 48, no. 3 , pp. 691–707, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/110422/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button