مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

658
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF LARS_WG AND REGCM4 MODELS IN SIMULATION AND POST-PROCESSING OF ANNUAL TEMPERATURE AND RAIN FALL DATA IN GREAT KHORASAN

Pages

  157-170

Abstract

 In this study, rainfall and temperature simulated annual in north - east of Iran (GREAT KHORASAN) In the period 1987-2011. Based on the results, in LARS model during verification period (2007-2013), average annual rainfall raw bias is equal to 53.63 millimeter and post- processed is -11.25. Shortly, in annual period, in 84% of studied stations, post-processing techniques have been effective and bias error rate has decreased heavily in more stations. Based on the results, in Reg-CM4 model during verification period (2006-2011), average annual rainfall raw bias is equal to 85.3 millimeter and post- processed is 61.04. Shortly, in annual period, in 75% of studied stations, post-processing techniques have been effective and MA technique is more effective. So absolute bias error after processing an average annual rainfall of LARS equal to 6.13 and RegCM4 model is 61.average annual temperature raw bias is equal to 0.096 millimeter and post - processed is -0.432. This is more than bias without post - processing hence, post-processing is not effective in all stations and only in 46% of stations are good. Simulation of 2-- meter temperature data in climate stations with RegCM model and MA technique show high effectiveness. Average annual temperature raw bias in RegCM4 model is equal to -2.78 millimeter and post- processed is -0.05. In all stations modeled annual temperature with Observed data has difference less than 0.1. Also in rainfall simulation, LARS_WG model is more better than RegCM model and in simulation of annual temperature data, DYNAMIC REGCM4 MODEL show more clear Objectivity of researched area rather than LARS_WG model.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AHMADI, MAHMOOD, LASHKARI, HASAN, KEIKHOSRAVI, GHASEM, & AZADI, MAJID. (2016). COMPARISON OF LARS_WG AND REGCM4 MODELS IN SIMULATION AND POST-PROCESSING OF ANNUAL TEMPERATURE AND RAIN FALL DATA IN GREAT KHORASAN. GEOGRAPHICAL DATA, 25(98), 157-170. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/253221/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AHMADI MAHMOOD, LASHKARI HASAN, KEIKHOSRAVI GHASEM, AZADI MAJID. COMPARISON OF LARS_WG AND REGCM4 MODELS IN SIMULATION AND POST-PROCESSING OF ANNUAL TEMPERATURE AND RAIN FALL DATA IN GREAT KHORASAN. GEOGRAPHICAL DATA[Internet]. 2016;25(98):157-170. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/253221/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MAHMOOD AHMADI, HASAN LASHKARI, GHASEM KEIKHOSRAVI, and MAJID AZADI, “COMPARISON OF LARS_WG AND REGCM4 MODELS IN SIMULATION AND POST-PROCESSING OF ANNUAL TEMPERATURE AND RAIN FALL DATA IN GREAT KHORASAN,” GEOGRAPHICAL DATA, vol. 25, no. 98, pp. 157–170, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/253221/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button