مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

837
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF FULL ARCH AND SECTIONAL IMPRESSION TRAYS ON THE ACCURACY OF IMPRESSIONS IN ANGULATED IMPLANTS

Pages

  4-11

Abstract

 Background and Aims: Taking IMPRESSION from angulated implants has always been a great challenge in clinic. In this regard, studies on sectional trays are very few. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the dimensional and angular accuracy of IMPRESSIONs using full arch and sectional trays.Materials and Methods: Four implants (4.3×12 mm) (Implantium, Dentium) were placed in the first premolar and molar regions of a Kennedy class I mandibular acrylic model with 30° lingual angulation. Twenty open special trays (Full arch & Sectional) were made on the primary cast. The IMPRESSIONs were taken using VINYL POLYSILOXANE (VPS) and were poured with type IV dental stone. The coordinate measuring machine (CMM) was used to measure the dimensional (Z, Y, X) and angular (q) coordinates of implants. The data were analyzed using and t-test and SPSS 22. Software.Results: The type of tray had no significant effect on the dimensional accuracy in X, Y and Z axes (P>0.05) and total linear displacement (r); However, it significantly affected the angular accuracy (Dq) (P<0.05).Conclusion: Sectional tray yields less rotational displacement in IMPRESSIONs made of angulated implants.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    ZEIGHAMI, SOMAYEH, SIADAT, HAKIMEH, ALIKHASI, MARZIEH, & SAEIDI, ZEINAB. (2017). A COMPARISON OF FULL ARCH AND SECTIONAL IMPRESSION TRAYS ON THE ACCURACY OF IMPRESSIONS IN ANGULATED IMPLANTS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 30(1), 4-11. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25500/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ZEIGHAMI SOMAYEH, SIADAT HAKIMEH, ALIKHASI MARZIEH, SAEIDI ZEINAB. A COMPARISON OF FULL ARCH AND SECTIONAL IMPRESSION TRAYS ON THE ACCURACY OF IMPRESSIONS IN ANGULATED IMPLANTS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2017;30(1):4-11. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25500/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SOMAYEH ZEIGHAMI, HAKIMEH SIADAT, MARZIEH ALIKHASI, and ZEINAB SAEIDI, “A COMPARISON OF FULL ARCH AND SECTIONAL IMPRESSION TRAYS ON THE ACCURACY OF IMPRESSIONS IN ANGULATED IMPLANTS,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25500/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button