IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT LINERS IN MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS II POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ESMAEILI BEHNAZ; BAZAZI AINAZ; BIJANI ALI

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental Medicine Year:2012 | Volume:25 | Issue:3 (72) Page(s): 174-181

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

814

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT LINERS IN MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS II POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS

Author(s)

ESMAEILI BEHNAZ | BAZAZI AINAZ | BIJANI ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COMPOSITEQ3

LINERQ3

MICROLEAKAGEQ3

Abstract

Background and Aims: Packable COMPOSITEs with high viscosity might not adapt properly to internal surfaces and cervical areas. The aim of this study was to assess the MICROLEAKAGE of class II posterior COMPOSITE restorations performed using different methods.Materials and Methods: Ninety proximal cavities were prepared in extracted sound premolar teeth, divided into three groups and filled as follows: 1- packable COMPOSITE (3M filtek P60), 2-Hybrid COMPOSITE (Z250) +P60 COMPOSITE and 3- Resin-modified glass ionomer LINER+P60 COMPOSITE. Afterwards, the samples were immersed in 0.5% Foushin solution and sectioned. Gingival MICROLEAKAGE was then graded. Obtained data were analyzed using paired t-test and analysis of variance.Results: In regard to distal cavities, significant difference was seen between the groups 1 and 3 (P=0.01) as well as groups 2 and 3 (P=0.03). Comparing MICROLEAKAGE of mesial and distal cavities, there was a significant difference in groups 1 (P=0.003) and 2 (P=0.005).Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, application of Z250 COMPOSITE had no effect on reduction of MICROLEAKAGE of class II posterior COMPOSITE restorations. Vitremer LINER decreased MICROLEAKAGE in dento-gingival margins.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ESMAEILI, BEHNAZ, BAZAZI, AINAZ, & BIJANI, ALI. (2012). IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT LINERS IN MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS II POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 25(3 (72)), 174-181. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25704/en

Vancouver: Copy

ESMAEILI BEHNAZ, BAZAZI AINAZ, BIJANI ALI. IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT LINERS IN MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS II POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2012;25(3 (72)):174-181. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25704/en

IEEE: Copy

BEHNAZ ESMAEILI, AINAZ BAZAZI, and ALI BIJANI, “IN VITRO EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT LINERS IN MICROLEAKAGE OF CLASS II POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, vol. 25, no. 3 (72), pp. 174–181, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25704/en

Related Journal Papers