REPRESENTING A MULTI-STEP TECHNIQUE OF THE COMMON WEIGHT AND TOPSIS FOR RANKING UNITS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HEMATI MOHAMMAD; ABBASI SAEEDEH

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MODERN RESEARCHES IN DECISION MAKING Year:2016 | Volume:1 | Issue:2 Page(s): 193-214

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

735

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

REPRESENTING A MULTI-STEP TECHNIQUE OF THE COMMON WEIGHT AND TOPSIS FOR RANKING UNITS

Author(s)

HEMATI MOHAMMAD | ABBASI SAEEDEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSISQ2

TOPSISQ2

RANKINGQ2

COMMON WEIGHTQ1

Abstract

In evaluating of organizations and institutions, one of the most important goals is to rank the units based on their performance. Since commonly used method of decision-making in DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS may lead to several efficient units, selecting the best of all units is always one of the main challenges in DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS. In this connection, different methods have been introduced for RANKING units. In this paper, a new method called COMMON WEIGHTs has been studied in detail. Two techniques (common weight and TOPSIS) have been studied on the real data of 17 banks in Semnan province. The results indicate that both two methods have achieved perfect ratings. Comparing the two methods shows that the COMMON WEIGHT rating is much closer to the reality. In addition, COMMON WEIGHT is a non-parametric method and has received a better rating based on the efficiency (relative) of efficient units. In the suggested method (common weight), all decision-making units have been taken together, while in the TOPSIS model, it is not so.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HEMATI, MOHAMMAD, & ABBASI, SAEEDEH. (2016). REPRESENTING A MULTI-STEP TECHNIQUE OF THE COMMON WEIGHT AND TOPSIS FOR RANKING UNITS. MODERN RESEARCHES IN DECISION MAKING, 1(2), 193-214. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/257882/en

Vancouver: Copy

HEMATI MOHAMMAD, ABBASI SAEEDEH. REPRESENTING A MULTI-STEP TECHNIQUE OF THE COMMON WEIGHT AND TOPSIS FOR RANKING UNITS. MODERN RESEARCHES IN DECISION MAKING[Internet]. 2016;1(2):193-214. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/257882/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD HEMATI, and SAEEDEH ABBASI, “REPRESENTING A MULTI-STEP TECHNIQUE OF THE COMMON WEIGHT AND TOPSIS FOR RANKING UNITS,” MODERN RESEARCHES IN DECISION MAKING, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 193–214, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/257882/en

Related Journal Papers