HISTOLOGIC COMPARISON OF BIO-OSS AND NEO-OSS IN BONE REGENERATION OF EXPERIMENTAL DEFECTS ON RABBIT
CALVARIUM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

PAKNEZHAD M.; ROKN A.R.; MOTAHARI P.; MIRZA TOLOOEI R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental Medicine Year:2006 | Volume:19 | Issue:2 (47) Page(s): 71-79

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

834

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HISTOLOGIC COMPARISON OF BIO-OSS AND NEO-OSS IN BONE REGENERATION OF EXPERIMENTAL DEFECTS ON RABBIT CALVARIUM

Author(s)

PAKNEZHAD M. | ROKN A.R. | MOTAHARI P. | MIRZA TOLOOEI R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RABBITQ3

BIO-OSS; NEO-OSSQ3

BONE GRAFTQ3

HISTOLOGIC STUDYQ4

BONE DEFECTQ3

Abstract

Background and Aim: Several biomaterials have been presented for regeneration of intraosseous defects and Bio-Oss is one of the most accepted materials in this field. Neo-Oss may be the first and only regenerative material made in Iran which few studies have been published about it. The aim of this study was the histologic evaluation of Neo-Oss in comparison with Bio-Oss in experimental RABBIT calvarial defects. Materials and Methods: This was an interventional in vivo study. After elevating muccoperiosteal flap 18 standard defects (3×6 mm) in frontal & parietal bone were made by round bur on the calvarium of 6 New Zealand RABBITs. Defects were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: 1-No graft (control), 2-Bio-Oss graft 3-Neo-Oss graft. After 4 weeks the animals were killed and histologic sections prepared. The studied variables consisted of inflammation, type of regenerated bone, thickness of bony trabeculation and foreign body reaction. Data were analyzed by Friedman test with p<0.05 as the limit of significance. Results: The results showed that Bio-Oss was effective for bone regeneration. Inflammation (P= 0.026) and foreign body reaction (P= 0.002) in Neo-Oss was significantly more than Bio-Oss group. Thickness of terabecula in Neo-Oss group (66.7% thin) was significantly different from Bio-Oss (100% thick) and control group (50% thin 50% thick) (P= 0.006). In Neo-Oss group, granulation tissue containing giant cells was observed and the rate of resorption during 4 weeks was high. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the healing capacity of Neo-Oss in comparison with Bio-Oss is not acceptable.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

PAKNEZHAD, M., ROKN, A.R., MOTAHARI, P., & MIRZA TOLOOEI, R.. (2006). HISTOLOGIC COMPARISON OF BIO-OSS AND NEO-OSS IN BONE REGENERATION OF EXPERIMENTAL DEFECTS ON RABBIT CALVARIUM. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 19(2 (47)), 71-79. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/25798/en

Vancouver: Copy

PAKNEZHAD M., ROKN A.R., MOTAHARI P., MIRZA TOLOOEI R.. HISTOLOGIC COMPARISON OF BIO-OSS AND NEO-OSS IN BONE REGENERATION OF EXPERIMENTAL DEFECTS ON RABBIT CALVARIUM. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2006;19(2 (47)):71-79. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/25798/en

IEEE: Copy

M. PAKNEZHAD, A.R. ROKN, P. MOTAHARI, and R. MIRZA TOLOOEI, “HISTOLOGIC COMPARISON OF BIO-OSS AND NEO-OSS IN BONE REGENERATION OF EXPERIMENTAL DEFECTS ON RABBIT CALVARIUM,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, vol. 19, no. 2 (47), pp. 71–79, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/25798/en

Related Journal Papers