A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CREDIT STATUS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF IRAN AND BRITAIN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

OMEYDI AYDA; AMANI MOHAMMAD HAMOON

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,271

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CREDIT STATUS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF IRAN AND BRITAIN

Author(s)

OMEYDI AYDA | AMANI MOHAMMAD HAMOON | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CREDENTIALSQ1

UNITED KINGDOMQ1

IRANQ2

PARLIAMENTQ2

HOUSE OF COMMONSQ1

Abstract

By holding elections and selecting people's deputies in different areas, the Ministry of the Interior must issue a credential to each elected person, this credential is that the CREDENTIALS of the representative have been legally approved, and he has been able to, after passing through various stages, the required votes and Get into the House. The CREDENTIALS are in fact the passport of the electorate to enter the PARLIAMENT. The UNITED KINGDOM does not have a constitution, and the sources of its basic rights are the same as those which apply to the general rules of law, which are: statutory or substantive law, customary law, judicial procedure. In addition, the English law has not yet been interpreted, and the views of the authors of the books and professors of the university are of great value in this field. This research aims to study the comparative study of credit status in the legal system of IRAN and Britain and conducted by descriptive analytical method It is accepted that the results indicate that the reputation of the representatives of the representatives in the legal system of IRAN and England is completely different, so that the CREDENTIALS of the representatives in the legal system of IRAN are approved by the delegates themselves, while in the English legal system by the members of the Supreme Court Approved or rejected.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

OMEYDI, AYDA, & AMANI, MOHAMMAD HAMOON. (2017). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CREDIT STATUS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF IRAN AND BRITAIN. JOURNAL OF CIVIL & LEGAL SCIENCES (GHANONYAR), 3(3), 241-256. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/259727/en

Vancouver: Copy

OMEYDI AYDA, AMANI MOHAMMAD HAMOON. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CREDIT STATUS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF IRAN AND BRITAIN. JOURNAL OF CIVIL & LEGAL SCIENCES (GHANONYAR)[Internet]. 2017;3(3):241-256. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/259727/en

IEEE: Copy

AYDA OMEYDI, and MOHAMMAD HAMOON AMANI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CREDIT STATUS IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF IRAN AND BRITAIN,” JOURNAL OF CIVIL & LEGAL SCIENCES (GHANONYAR), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 241–256, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/259727/en

Related Journal Papers