مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

598
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of Scientometric Organizations Based on Scientometric Indicators

Pages

  131-156

Abstract

 Purpose: This study aims to clarify the status of Scientometric indicators in science Scientometric organizations. Methodology: This article is a descriptive and library research. Searching in scientific databases and literature review, we identified Scientometric organizations as well as Scientometric indicators, then extracted the data using a checklist. After classifying the databases, a log was completed for each of them and they finally were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Findings: Scientometric indicators differ in each group of scientometric databases. Impact Factor was used in 22 databases (52. 38) and it was identified as the most applied scientometric indicator. The Hirsch index appeared in at least 15 databases (35. 71) and was ranked second. Among the studied databases, “ university ranking databases” were ranked as top using Scientometric indicators (85 indicators) and “ human and financial databases” obtained the second rank using 56 indicators. In other databases, “ JCR” and “ professional or subject index” using seven indicators, jointly located at the sixth lowest rate in the indicators, respectively. Conclusion: The results of the study showed that the scientometrics databases are different in using Scientometric indicators, and similar indicators can be introduced for each group of measurement bases.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ZAREI, E., & SEDDIGHI, Z.. (2017). A Comparative Study of Scientometric Organizations Based on Scientometric Indicators. SCIENTOMETRICS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 3(1 (5) ), 131-156. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/259825/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ZAREI E., SEDDIGHI Z.. A Comparative Study of Scientometric Organizations Based on Scientometric Indicators. SCIENTOMETRICS RESEARCH JOURNAL[Internet]. 2017;3(1 (5) ):131-156. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/259825/en

    IEEE: Copy

    E. ZAREI, and Z. SEDDIGHI, “A Comparative Study of Scientometric Organizations Based on Scientometric Indicators,” SCIENTOMETRICS RESEARCH JOURNAL, vol. 3, no. 1 (5) , pp. 131–156, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/259825/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button