INTRODUCTION AND A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WEB CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT MODELS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BEHROOZFAR HEDAYAT; SANATJOO AZAM; NOKARIZI MOHSEN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION Year:2017 | Volume:4 | Issue:3 Page(s): 87-102

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

610

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

INTRODUCTION AND A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WEB CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT MODELS

Author(s)

BEHROOZFAR HEDAYAT | SANATJOO AZAM | NOKARIZI MOHSEN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KEY CREDIBILITY DIMENSIONSQ1

WEB CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENTQ1

INFORMATION CREDIBILITYQ2

INFORMATION QUALITYQ2

STANDARD TOOLQ1

Abstract

Background and Aim: Since anyone can freely share any kinds of information in the cyberspace almost without authenticity, validation information seems important. This paper examines the concept of credibility and describes and analyzes some well-known models for the evaluation of the Web credibility.Methods: This research is a review in terms of research methodology and theoretical in terms of the goal. Data collection was using documentary method.Results: The assessment of known models of Web Credibility including prominenceinterpretation theory of Fogg, Wathen and Burkell’s model for how users judge the credibility of on-line information, Hilligoss and Rieh’s unifying framework of credibility, Sundar’s MAIN model, Metzger’s dual processing model of credibility assessment, Lucassen et al.’s revised 3S-model of credibility, and Choi new framework for web credibility showed that the systematic concept of the connection between credit key dimensions and criteria that can be used to assess the credibility of the Web exists in none of these models other than Choi and thus the templates and the theories have limited explanatory power for a comprehensive interpretation of findings of experimental studies.Conclusion: Due to lack of imperical testing of these theoretical frameworks through STANDARD TOOLs on a large scale, no one was empirically supported. Thus, it is necessary to examine these frameworks empirically to improve their validity with an experimental basis.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BEHROOZFAR, HEDAYAT, SANATJOO, AZAM, & NOKARIZI, MOHSEN. (2017). INTRODUCTION AND A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WEB CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT MODELS. HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION, 4(3 ), 87-102. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/260348/en

Vancouver: Copy

BEHROOZFAR HEDAYAT, SANATJOO AZAM, NOKARIZI MOHSEN. INTRODUCTION AND A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WEB CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT MODELS. HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION[Internet]. 2017;4(3 ):87-102. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/260348/en

IEEE: Copy

HEDAYAT BEHROOZFAR, AZAM SANATJOO, and MOHSEN NOKARIZI, “INTRODUCTION AND A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WEB CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT MODELS,” HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION, vol. 4, no. 3 , pp. 87–102, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/260348/en

Related Journal Papers