The Balance of the Principle of Freedom of Obtaining Evidence with the Exclusionary Rule of Invalidity of Obtained Evidence through Illegal Means from the Point of View of Islamic Jurisprudence, Iranian law and Law of the West (With Emphasis on USA and Germany)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FATHI MORTEZA; REZAEE REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ISLAMIC AND WESTERN LAW Year:2019 | Volume:6 | Issue:2 (20) Page(s): 55-86

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

554

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Balance of the Principle of Freedom of Obtaining Evidence with the Exclusionary Rule of Invalidity of Obtained Evidence through Illegal Means from the Point of View of Islamic Jurisprudence, Iranian law and Law of the West (With Emphasis on USA and Germany)

Author(s)

FATHI MORTEZA | REZAEE REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Evidence ObtainingQ2

Exclusionary RuleQ1

Direct EvidenceQ1

Indirect EvidenceQ1

The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree DoctrineQ1

Abstract

Discovery of the truth always is regarded as one of the most important issues of criminal trial which is feasible through obtaining evidence. Public security requires that the judicial authority does not hesitate to resort to any evidence to discover the truth, but what that is against principle of free obtaining of evidence are human rights guarantees. In other words, on the one hand there is the right to security that concerns the rights of the citizens, and on the other hand, the right to obtain that is related to the rights of the accused is arisen. Now, priority is assigned to which one of them? In this regard, the Exclusionary Rule and The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine rule for the outflow of the evidence obtained through illegal means. The Exclusionary Rule deals with direct or firsthand evidence and the Doctrine addresses the indirect ones. Despite the origin of the Rule that is derived from the Common Law countries, in Islamic criminal law the principle is in favor of the validity of the evidence, unless the evidence is explicitly nullified or is obtained through illegitimate means. Absolute and strict implementation of this Rule throws the criminal justice system into crisis in discovering the truth. Accordingly, it is necessary to establish a minimum balance between the freedom of obtaining evidence and the Exclusionary Rule. In this regard, doctrines of status, independent source, deterministic discovery, weakening, goodwill and contemporary jurisprudential theory have guidelines that restraint the absolute implementation of the Exclusionary Rule.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FATHI, MORTEZA, & REZAEE, REZA. (2019). The Balance of the Principle of Freedom of Obtaining Evidence with the Exclusionary Rule of Invalidity of Obtained Evidence through Illegal Means from the Point of View of Islamic Jurisprudence, Iranian law and Law of the West (With Emphasis on USA and Germany). JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ISLAMIC AND WESTERN LAW, 6(2 (20) ), 55-86. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/262084/en

Vancouver: Copy

FATHI MORTEZA, REZAEE REZA. The Balance of the Principle of Freedom of Obtaining Evidence with the Exclusionary Rule of Invalidity of Obtained Evidence through Illegal Means from the Point of View of Islamic Jurisprudence, Iranian law and Law of the West (With Emphasis on USA and Germany). JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ISLAMIC AND WESTERN LAW[Internet]. 2019;6(2 (20) ):55-86. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/262084/en

IEEE: Copy

MORTEZA FATHI, and REZA REZAEE, “The Balance of the Principle of Freedom of Obtaining Evidence with the Exclusionary Rule of Invalidity of Obtained Evidence through Illegal Means from the Point of View of Islamic Jurisprudence, Iranian law and Law of the West (With Emphasis on USA and Germany),” JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON ISLAMIC AND WESTERN LAW, vol. 6, no. 2 (20) , pp. 55–86, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/262084/en

Related Journal Papers