The Jurisprudential-Legal Analysis of Intermingled Intentional Injuries (With an Emphasis on the Islamic Penal Code 2013)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MORADI HASAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: CRIMINAL LAW RESEARCH Year:2019 | Volume:7 | Issue:25 Page(s): 231-264

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,041

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Jurisprudential-Legal Analysis of Intermingled Intentional Injuries (With an Emphasis on the Islamic Penal Code 2013)

Author(s)

MORADI HASAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Intermingled injuries

Retaliation (Qisas)

Compensation (Diyyah)

The Islamic Penal Code 201

Abstract

The standardization of multiple injuries for how to claim retaliation (Qisas) or compensation (Diyyah) has been a significant part of the jurisprudential doctrines on the rules of Qisas. Contrary to the rule of multiple crime which is one of the factors of the aggravation of punishment, the multiplicity of injuries has various assumptions: Sometimes, an injury may be committed by one person against another person or others or by a few people against a person. It may also result from a blow or multiple blows, at one or different times. Islamic jurists of the Imamieh have expressed different opinions in this regard. Some of them believe in an absolute interminglement, some believe otherwise, and some of them, have different opinion depending on the unit or multiple and consecutive or alternate blows. In The Islamic Penal Code 2013, follows the famous opinion in Imamieh jurisprudence and accepts the not-interminglement opinion, except in exceptional cases, provided that the multiple intentional injuries result in a multiplicity of retaliation. In this article, by analyzing the related jurisprudential doctrines, the criteria set out in the above-mentioned law have been criticized, and proposals for amending the law are provided.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MORADI, HASAN. (2019). The Jurisprudential-Legal Analysis of Intermingled Intentional Injuries (With an Emphasis on the Islamic Penal Code 2013). CRIMINAL LAW RESEARCH, 7(25 ), 231-264. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/266647/en

Vancouver: Copy

MORADI HASAN. The Jurisprudential-Legal Analysis of Intermingled Intentional Injuries (With an Emphasis on the Islamic Penal Code 2013). CRIMINAL LAW RESEARCH[Internet]. 2019;7(25 ):231-264. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/266647/en

IEEE: Copy

HASAN MORADI, “The Jurisprudential-Legal Analysis of Intermingled Intentional Injuries (With an Emphasis on the Islamic Penal Code 2013),” CRIMINAL LAW RESEARCH, vol. 7, no. 25 , pp. 231–264, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/266647/en

Related Journal Papers