THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE USE OF ANALOGY (QIYAS) AND OF REASON (DALIL AL_ AQL) IN INFERRING ISLAMIC RULINGS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAFARI HARANDI MOHAMMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: FIGHE MOQARAN Year:2016 | Volume:3 | Issue:6 Page(s): 37-54

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,257

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE USE OF ANALOGY (QIYAS) AND OF REASON (DALIL AL_ AQL) IN INFERRING ISLAMIC RULINGS

Author(s)

JAFARI HARANDI MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

REASON/ RATIONAL PROOF

NON-LITERAL (PROOF)

TANQIH AL-MANAT (EXTRACTION OF THE UNDERLYING REASON)

FAHM AL-MAA’YIR (UNDERSTANDING OF CRITERION)

ANALOGY (QIYAS)

Abstract

In their books on Islamic jurisprudence, Imāmīyya jurists consider the concept of reason/ rational argument along with the Book of Allah, the Sunnah and Consensus as various ways for inferring Islamic rules, unanimously agreeing that reason/ rational argument can be used for reaching religious rules. The use of rational argument is mainly discussed under the categories of Mustaqillat Aqliyah (the independently rational), Istilzamat Aqliyah (the dependently rational), NON-LITERAL (PROOF)s; proofs other than those which are in statements, such as the Sunnah and Consensus), Tanqih al-Manat (extraction of the underlying reason) and Fahm al-Maay’ir (understanding of criterion). However, when it comes to the use of analogy – particularly of the inferred type – to establish religious rules, these jurists defy rational argument definitively, arguing that it cannot infer the underlying reason, after making references to Islamic narratives that forbid acting based on analogy. But we are faced with a critical question: How is that reason/ rational argument, with all its importance and breadth, is rejected when it comes to analogy whereas it is the basis for inferring religious rules in the above-mentioned cases, and perhaps in some other cases as well, at least for Mujtahids? The present undertaking emphasizes that the underlying reason of a religious rule, as inferred by and as the product of rational argument which is a valid source for inferring rules, can be used as criterion elsewhere too and it, thus, should not be devalued against a rule which is established independently by pure reason. As a result, analogy as apparently refuted in the Imamiyya School should not be read in the common sense of the term. Rather, textual arguments that refute analogy signify a completely different thing.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAFARI HARANDI, MOHAMMAD. (2016). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE USE OF ANALOGY (QIYAS) AND OF REASON (DALIL AL_ AQL) IN INFERRING ISLAMIC RULINGS. FIGHE MOQARAN, 3(6 ), 37-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/267022/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAFARI HARANDI MOHAMMAD. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE USE OF ANALOGY (QIYAS) AND OF REASON (DALIL AL_ AQL) IN INFERRING ISLAMIC RULINGS. FIGHE MOQARAN[Internet]. 2016;3(6 ):37-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/267022/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD JAFARI HARANDI, “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE USE OF ANALOGY (QIYAS) AND OF REASON (DALIL AL_ AQL) IN INFERRING ISLAMIC RULINGS,” FIGHE MOQARAN, vol. 3, no. 6 , pp. 37–54, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/267022/en

Related Journal Papers