مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

186
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

81
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Renal Access by Sonographer versus Urologist during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Pages

  1035-1039

Abstract

 Purpose: To evaluate the percutaneous access outcomes and complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) that was obtained by sonographer or urologist at a single academic institution. Material and Methods: A retrospective chart review of 259 patients who underwent PCNL was performed. Patients were stratified according to percutaneous access by sonographer (group 1) or urologist (group 2) in 174 and 85 patients, respectively. Demographic, stone characteristics, operative variables, percutaneous access complications and stone-free rates were compared between groups. Results: The major complication rate and minor complication rate, mean blood loss and rates of blood transfusion were comparable between groups. Compared with urologist, sonographer preferred to choose subcostal rib puncture instead of intercostal rib puncture. The lower calyx was the most frequent site of target calyx puncture in group 1 (165 cases, 94. 8%), while the percentage of lower calyx in group 2 was 82. 3% (72 cases) (P =. 001). The overall stone-free rates were significantly higher in group 2 than that in group 1 (90. 6% vs. 79. 9%, P =. 03). In group 1, 23 cases (13. 2%) needed post-operative extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), while, the percentage of post-operative SWL in group 2 was only 4. 7% (4 cases) (P =. 035). Conclusions: Renal access in PCNL can be safely and successfully obtained by both sonographer and urologist. Infracostal and lower calyx access in our study has poor stone-free rates and sonographer prefers infracostal and lower access. We encourage urologists establish renal access by themselves during PCNL.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Wang, Yanbo, Lu, Zhihua, Hu, Jinghai, Wang, Xiaoqing, Lu, Ji, Hao, Yuanyuan, WANG, YAN, Chen, Qihui, Jiang, Fengming, Zhang, Haifeng, Xu, Ning, Hou, Yuchuan, & Wang, Chunxi. (2013). Renal Access by Sonographer versus Urologist during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE). UROLOGY JOURNAL, 10(4), 1035-1039. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/271053/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Wang Yanbo, Lu Zhihua, Hu Jinghai, Wang Xiaoqing, Lu Ji, Hao Yuanyuan, WANG YAN, Chen Qihui, Jiang Fengming, Zhang Haifeng, Xu Ning, Hou Yuchuan, Wang Chunxi. Renal Access by Sonographer versus Urologist during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE). UROLOGY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2013;10(4):1035-1039. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/271053/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Yanbo Wang, Zhihua Lu, Jinghai Hu, Xiaoqing Wang, Ji Lu, Yuanyuan Hao, YAN WANG, Qihui Chen, Fengming Jiang, Haifeng Zhang, Ning Xu, Yuchuan Hou, and Chunxi Wang, “Renal Access by Sonographer versus Urologist during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE),” UROLOGY JOURNAL, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1035–1039, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/271053/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button